Evidence or Instinct? An Overview of International Exploration of the Impact Assessment Practices of Intervention Providers Supporting Leaving Extremism

Heidi Maiberg

Authors

Heidi Maiberg University of Tartu

Keywords:

Deradicalisation, Exit, Impact Assessment, Evaluation, Evidence-Based

Abstract

Despite the increasing need for tertiary prevention programme interventions, knowledge is lacking on which methods used in programmes work and which do not. Through semi-structured interviews with twelve practitioners and combination of grounded theory and reflexive thematic analysis, this article explores: how do tertiary prevention intervention providers measure the progress or regression of participants; how do tertiary prevention intervention providers measure the impact of programmes; and what is the reasoning for not practising impact assessment. The results show that 50% of the interviewed practitioners measure participant progress with standardised tools or set criteria. To measure participant progress, practitioners employ screening, needs assessment, indicators of change, and standardised tools. Programme development is tracked through monitoring or evaluation conducted by an outside evaluator or funder. Intervention providers prefer not to conduct impact assessment for various reasons, including their academic background that pushes them away from available instruments, feeling that currently available tools are not reliable or a tendency to work based on professional intuition. They hesitate to guarantee results due to fear of losing funding or credibility if a participant relapses and re-engages. Last, this article brings out practitioners’ perspectives that highlight not only current practices but also several gaps in the field that need further research.

References

Abdulsalam, Y.K., Theeboom, M. and Coalter, F. (2023). Football-based prevention of radicalisation: A Theory of Change for football-based prevention of Radicalisation. Journal for Deradicalization, [online] (35), pp.138–173. Available at: https://journals.sfu.ca/jd/index.php/jd/article/view/745 [Accessed 28 Jan. 2024].

Atran, S. et al. (2017) ‘Challenges in researching terrorism from the field’, Science (New York, N.Y.), 355(6323), pp. 352–354. doi: 10.1126/science.aaj2037

BBC (2019). London Bridge: Usman Khan completed untested rehabilitation scheme. BBC. [online] 4 Dec. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-50653191 [Accessed 11 Dec. 2023].

Beaghley, S., Helmus, T.C., Matthews, M., Ramchand, R., Stebbins, D., Kadlec, A. and Brown, M.A. (2017). Development and Pilot Test of the RAND Program Evaluation Toolkit for Countering Violent Extremism. [online] RAND Corporation, pp.1–51. Available at: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1085540.pdf [Accessed 19 Jan. 2024].

Bostock, B. (2019). 24 people have been killed by terrorists who went through government ‘deradicalization’ programs, showing why these efforts are crucially flawed. [online] Business Insider. Available at: https://www.businessinsider.com/deradicalization-terrorists-does-it-work-london-bridge-2019-12 [Accessed 11 Dec. 2023].

Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), pp.77–101.

Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. London: Sage.

Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis. [online] SAGE Publications Ltd. Available at: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/thematic-analysis/book248481.

Bucci, N. and Knaus, C. (2023). Coalition warned of problems with tool to predict future terrorist crime but continued to use it on offenders. The Guardian. [online] 7 Apr. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/apr/08/coalition-warned-of-problems-with-tool-to-predict-future-terrorist-but-continued-to-use-it-on-offenders [Accessed 16 Jan. 2024].

Buckley, C. (2024). From Former to Practitioner. In: G. Clubb, R. Scrivens and MD.D. Islam, eds., Former Extremists: Preventing and Countering Violence. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.298–301.

Cherney, A. and Belton, E. (2019). Assessing intervention outcomes targeting radicalised offenders: Testing the pro integration model of extremist disengagement as an evaluation tool. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, pp.1–19.

Cherney, A., Belton, E. and Koehler, D. (2020). Program integrity guidelines to inform the design, implementation and evaluation of P/CVE initiatives: Guideline review document & Program integrity toolkit. [online] Countering Violent Extremism Unit, Department of Justice and Community Safety and the University of Queensland, pp.1–51. Available at: https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:82987ea [Accessed 15 Jan. 2024].

Cherney, A. and Belton, E. (2021). Evaluating Case-Managed Approaches to Counter Radicalization and Violent Extremism: An Example of the Proactive Integrated Support Model (PRISM) Intervention. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, [online] 8(44), pp.625–645. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/1057610X.2019.1577016.

Christensen, T.W. (2019). Lessons Learned from P/CVE Youth Mentorship. [online] Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies, pp.1–16. Available at: https://rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/conference-reports/lessons-learned-pcve-youth-mentorship [Accessed 18 Mar. 2020].

Clubb, G., Scrivens, R. and Islam, MD.D. eds., (2024). Former Extremists: Preventing and Countering Violence. Former Extremists: Preventing and Countering Violence, New York: Oxford University Press, pp.1–330.

Clubb, G., Sengfelder, K., Altier, M.B., Scrivens, R. and Islam, D. (2024). Standards for Employing Formers in P/CVE. [online] International Centre for Counter-Terrorism - ICCT, ICCT, pp.1–25. Available at: https://icct.nl/publication/standards-employing-formers-pcve [Accessed 12 Feb. 2025].

Copeland, S. and Marsden, S. (2020). Extremist Risk Assessment. [online] Centre for Research and Evidence on Security Threats, pp.1–16. Available at: https://crestresearch.ac.uk/resources/extremist-risk-assessment/ [Accessed 10 Jan. 2024].

Corner, E. and Taylor, H. (2020). Testing the Reliability, Validity, and Equity of Terrorism Risk Assessment Tools. [online] Australian National University, pp.1–216. Available at: https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/foi/files/2023/fa-230400097-document-released-part-1.PDF [Accessed 1 Jan. 2024].

Daugherty, C., 2019. Deradicalization and Disengagement: Exit Programs in Norway and Sweden and Addressing Neo-Nazi Extremism. Journal for Deradicalization, [online] (21). Available at: <https://journals.sfu.ca/jd/index.php/jd/article/view/287/195> [Accessed 28 December 2020].

da Silva, R. (2023). Interventions with ‘at risk’ individuals. In: J. Busher, L. Malkki and S. Marsden, eds., The Routledge Handbook on Radicalisation and Countering Radicalisation. Routledge, pp.461–475.

Dolnik, A. (2011) ‘Conducting field research on terrorism: a brief primer’, Perspectives on Terrorism, 5(2), pp. 3–35. Available at: http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1755&context=lawpapers.

Duits, N. and Kempes, M. (2023). Interrater and intra-rater reliability of the VERA-2R tool. Frontiers in Psychiatry, [online] 14. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1236295.

El-Said, H. (2012) ‘Developments in Radicalisation and Political Violence. De-Radicalising Islamists: Programmes and their Impact in Muslim Majority States’, (January), p. 52. Available at: http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/13957/.

European Commission (2022). Strategic orientations on a coordinated EU approach to prevention of radicalisation for 2022-2023. [online] Available at: https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2022-03/2022-2023%20Strategic%20orientations%20on%20a%20coordinated%20EU%20approach%20to%20prevention%20of%20radicalisation_en.pdf [Accessed 20 Sep. 2023].

Feddes, A.R. and Gallucci, M. (2015). A Literature Review on Methodology used in Evaluating Effects of Preventive and De-radicalisation Interventions. Journal for Deradicalization, [online] 0(5), pp.1–27. Available at: https://journals.sfu.ca/jd/index.php/jd/article/view/33 [Accessed 7 Jul. 2021].

Frenett, R. (2024). The Ethical Imperatives of Engaging Formers in Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism Efforts. In: G. Clubb, R. Scrivens and MD.D. Islam, eds., Former Extremists: Preventing and Countering Violence. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.302–308.

Gansewig, A. and Walsh, M. (2021). Broadcast Your Past: Analysis of a German Former Right-Wing Extremist’s YouTube Channel for Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism and Crime. Journal for Deradicalization, [online] (29), pp.129–176. Available at: https://journals.sfu.ca/jd/index.php/jd/article/view/531/317 [Accessed 6 Oct. 2023].

Germain, A., Nolan, K., Doyle, R., Mason, S., Gambles, M., Chen, H., Smeding, R. and Ellershaw, J. (2016). The use of reflective diaries in end of life training programmes: a study exploring the impact of self-reflection on the participants in a volunteer training programme. BMC Palliative Care, 15(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-016-0096-5.

Gielen, A.-J. and Van Leeuwen, A. (2023). Debunking Prevailing Assumptions About Monitoring and Evaluation for P/CVE Programmes and Policies. [online] International Centre for Counter-Terrorism. Available at: https://www.icct.nl/sites/default/files/2023-12/Debunking%20Prevailing%20Assumptions%20About%20Monitoring%20and%20Evaluation.pdf [Accessed 17 Feb. 2024].

Gielen, A.-J. (2019). Countering Violent Extremism: A Realist Review for Assessing What Works, for Whom, in What Circumstances, and How? Terrorism and Political Violence, pp.1–19.

Glaser, Barney G, and Anselm L Strauss. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitive Research. Weidenfeld And Nicolson, 1967.

Gøtzsche-Astrup, O. (2018). The time for causal designs: Review and evaluation of empirical support for mechanisms of political radicalisation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 39, pp.90–99.

Hacker, E. and Pisoiu, D. (2024). Doing it again. Assessing the features and implications of terrorism recidivism in the context of jihadi attacks in Europe. [online] Journal for Deradicalization. Available at: https://www.oiip.ac.at/cms/media/963-article-text-2457-1-10-20240921.pdf [Accessed 12 Feb. 2025].

Hamdan, A.K. (2009). Reflexivity of Discomfort in Insider-Outsider Educational Research. McGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l’éducation de McGill , [online] 44(3), pp.377–404. doi:https://doi.org/10.7202/039946ar.

Hassan, A.S.R.B. (2019). Denmark’s De-radicalisation Programme for Returning Foreign Terrorist Fighters. Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses, [online] 11(3), pp.13–16. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26617829.

Hecker, M. (2021). ONCE A JIHADIST, ALWAYS A JIHADIST? A Deradicalization Program Seen from the Inside. Security Studies Center, pp.1–80.

Hettiarachchi, M. (2018). Rehabilitation to deradicalise detainees and inmates: a counter-terrorism strategy. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 13(2), pp.267–283. doi:10.1080/18335330.2018.1476774.

Hill, T. and Dao, M. (2020). Personal pasts become academic presents: engaging reflexivity and considering dual insider/outsider roles in physical cultural fieldwork. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, [online] 13(3), pp.1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676x.2020.1731576.

Holmberg, J. and Robert, K.-H. . (2000). Backcasting — a framework for strategic planning. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 7(4), pp.291–308. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500009470049.

Horgan, J., & Braddock, K. (2010). Rehabilitating the terrorists?: Challenges in assessing the effectiveness of de-radicalization programs. Terrorism and Political Violence, 22(2), 267–291.

Hwang, J. C. (2017) ‘The disengagement of Indonesian Jihadists: Understanding the pathways’, Terrorism and Political Violence, 29(2). doi: 10.1080/09546553.2015.1034855

Jugl, I. (2022). Breaking up the Bubble: Improving critical thinking skills and tolerance of ambiguity in deradicalization mentoring. Journal for Deradicalization, [online] (30), pp.45–80. Available at: https://journals.sfu.ca/jd/index.php/jd/article/view/573 [Accessed 28 Jan. 2024].

Khalil, J. (2019) ‘A guide to interviewing terrorists and violent extremists’, Studies in Conflict and Terrorism. doi: 10.1080/1057610X.2017.1385182

Khalil, J., Brown, R., Chant, C., Olowo, P. and Wood, N. (2019). Deradicalisation and Disengagement in Somalia: Evidence from a Rehabilitation Programme for Former Members of Al-Shabaab. [online] Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies, pp.1–50. Available at: https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/whitehall-reports/deradicalisation-and-disengagement-somalia-evidence-rehabilitation-programme-former-members-al [Accessed 18 Mar. 2022].

Khalil, J., Horgan, J. and Zeuthen, M. (2019). The Attitudes-Behaviors Corrective (ABC) Model of Violent Extremism. Terrorism and Political Violence, pp.1–26.

Khalil, J., Zeuthen, M. and Marsden, S. (2023). A Guide to Deradicalisation & Disengagement Programming: Designing and Implementing Interventions through the Lens of the ABC Model. [online] CREST, pp.1–36. Available at: https://crestresearch.ac.uk/resources/guide-to-deradicalisation-disengagement-programming/.

Koehler, D. (2017). STRUCTURAL QUALITY STANDARDS for work to intervene with and counter violent extremism. [online] KPEBW, pp.1–56. Available at: https://d-nb.info/112503100X/34.

Koehler, D. and Fiebig, V. (2019). Knowing What to Do: Academic and Practitioner Understanding of How to Counter Violent Radicalization. Perspectives on Terrorism, (3), pp.44–62.

Koehler, D. (2021). From traitor to zealot exploring the phenomenon of side-switching in extremism and terrorism. Cambridge, United Kingdom; New York, NY; Cambridge University Press.

Koehler, D., Cherney, A. and Templar, A. (2023). Truth or Dare? Exploring the Importance of Factual Accuracy in Different Deradicalization Counseling Approaches. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, [online] pp.1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610x.2023.2256535.

Koehler, D. (2024). Understanding the Effectiveness of Formers: Contexts and Measurements. In: G. Clubb, R. Scrivens and MD.D. Islam, eds., Former Extremists: Preventing and Countering Violence. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.17–36.

Lautz, Y. von, Bösing, E., Kart, M. and Stein, M. (2023). Counseling towards the Deradicalization of Islamist Extremists: An Overview of Approaches Based on Two Qualitative Interview Studies with Prevention Practitioners in Germany. Journal for Deradicalization, [online] (36), pp.23–63. Available at: https://journals.sfu.ca/jd/index.php/jd/article/view/775 [Accessed 10 Oct. 2023].

Lewis, J.S., Marsden, S., Cherney, A., Zeuthen, M., Bélanger, J.J., Anastasiia Zubareva, Jürgen Brandsch and Lubrano, M. (2023). PROTOCOL: Case management interventions seeking to counter radicalisation to violence: A systematic review of tools and approaches. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 19(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1301.

Maiberg, H. (2024). Evidence or Instinct? An International Exploration of the Impact Assessment Practices of Intervention Providers Supporting Leaving Extremism. [Doctoral thesis] pp.1–297. Available at: https://pure.royalholloway.ac.uk/en/publications/evidence-or-instinct-an-international-exploration-of-the-impact-a.

Malkki, L., Prokic, M. and van der Vet, I. (2023). How to design PVE/CVE and de-radicalisation initiatives and evaluations according to the principles of evidence-based practice. [online] INDEED, pp.1–46. Available at: https://www.indeedproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/ENG_E-Guidebook_D3.6.pdf [Accessed 1 Feb. 2024].

Malterud, K., Siersma, V.D. and Guassora, A.D. (2016). Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), pp.1753–1760. doi:10.1177/1049732315617444.

Marsden, S.V. (2015). Conceptualising ‘success’ with those convicted of terrorism offences: Aims, methods, and barriers to reintegration. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 7(2), pp.143–165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2014.1001421.

Marsden, S.V. (2017). Reintegrating extremists: deradicalisation and desistance. London: Palgrave Pivot.

Marsden, S.V., Knott, K. and Lewis, J. (2017). CENTRE FOR RESEARCH AND EVIDENCE ON SECURITY THREATS. [online] CREST. Available at: https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/88097/1/17_008_01.pdf [Accessed 24 Jan. 2022]

Mattsson, C. and Johansson, T., 2019. Leaving Hate Behind – Neo-Nazis, Significant Others and Disengagement. Journal for Deradicalization, [online] (18). Available at: <https://journals.sfu.ca/jd/index.php/jd/article/view/193/147> [Accessed 28 December 2020].

McBride, M.K., Carroll, M., Mellea, J., Hughes, D. and Savoia, E. (2022). Evaluating Terrorist and Extremist Reintegration Programming: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal for Deradicalization, [online] (32), pp.35–75. Available at: https://journals.sfu.ca/jd/index.php/jd/article/view/643 [Accessed 17 Aug. 2023].

McCauley, C. and Moskalenko, S. (2017). Understanding political radicalization: The two-pyramids model. American Psychologist, 72(3), pp.205–216.

Meredith, K. and Örell, R. (2024). Transitioning from Former Violent Extremist to Exit Peer Specialist . In: G. Clubb, R. Scrivens and MD.D. Islam, eds., Former Extremists: Preventing and Countering Violence. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.252–264.

Monahan, J. (2011). The individual risk assessment of terrorism. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 18(2), pp.167–205. doi:10.1037/a0025792.

Morrison, J.F., Silke, A., Maiberg, H., Slay, C. and Stewart, R. (2021). A Systematic Review Of Post-2017 Research On Disengagement And Deradicalisation. [online] CREST, pp.1–62. Available at: https://crestresearch.ac.uk/resources/a-systematic-review-of-post-2017-research-on-disengagement-and-deradicalisation/.

Morrison, J., Silke, A. and McGown, E. (2021). The Development of the Framework for Research Ethics in Terrorism Studies (FRETS). Terrorism and Political Violence, [online] 33(2), pp.271–289. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2021.1880196.

Muluk, H., Umam, A.N. and Milla, M.N. (2019). Insights from a deradicalization program in Indonesian prisons: The potential benefits of psychological intervention prior to ideological discussion. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 23(1), pp.42–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12392.

Nilsson, M. (2017). Interviewing Jihadists: On the Importance of Drinking Tea and Other Methodological Considerations. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, [online] 41(6), pp.419–432. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610x.2017.1325649.

Pettinger, T. (2020). British terrorism preemption: Subjectivity and disjuncture in Channel ‘de-radicalization’ interventions. The British Journal of Sociology, 71(5). doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12754.

Pyszora, N., Mischel, K., Doroc, M. and Prince, N. (2022). Violent extremism risk assessment in the Australian courts; professional and ethical challenges for the expert witness in post-sentence preventative detention cases. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 17(3), pp.1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/18335330.2022.2117566.

Radicalisation Awareness Network (2017). Dos and don’ts of involving formers in PVE/CVE work. [online] journal-exit.de, RAN Centre of Excellence, pp.1–8. Available at: https://journal-exit.de/formers-in-pve-cve/ [Accessed 20 Sep. 2023].

Radicalisation Awareness Network (2018). EX POST PAPER GUIDELINE EVALUATION OF PCVE PROGRAMMES AND INTERVENTIONS. RAN Centre for Excellence.

AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, [online] 19(1), pp.41–60. Available at: http://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/ahkam/article/view/10272 [Accessed 27 Jan. 2022].

Savoia, E., King, M., Ekström, A., Hughes, D., Baker, A. and Labrique, L. (2022). Assessing COUNTERING VIOLENT EXTREMISM (CVE) Initiatives Across the West: Lessons Learned. [online] Fletch Security Review. Available at: https://www.fletchersecurity.org/_files/ugd/c28a64_9d692a8a9d7648899f4452626ca1a7fb.pdf.

Schuurman, B. and Bakker, E. (2015). Reintegrating jihadist extremists: evaluating a Dutch initiative, 2013–2014. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 8(1), pp.66–85

Silke, A. (2011). Disengagement or Deradicalization: A Look at Prison Programs for Jailed Terrorists. CTC Sentinel, [online] pp.18–21. Available at: https://ctc.westpoint.edu/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/CTCSentinel-Vol4Iss16.pdf.

Silke, A., Morrison, J., Maiberg, H., Slay, C. and Stewart, R. (2021). The Phoenix Model of Disengagement and Deradicalisation from Terrorism and Violent Extremism. Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform, 104(3), pp.310–320. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/mks-2021-0128.

Sluka, J. A. (2020) ‘Too dangerous for fieldwork? The challenge of institutional risk-management in primary research on conflict, violence and “Terrorism”*’, Contemporary Social Science. Taylor & Francis, 15(2), pp. 241–257. doi: 10.1080/21582041.2018.1498534

Stern, J. and Pascarelli, P. (2019). PRISON-BASED DERADICALIZATION What do we need to determine what works? In: S.J. Hansen and S. Lid, eds., Routledge Handbook of Deradicalisation and Disengagement. Routledge.

Stern, J. and Porges, M.L. (2010). Getting Deradicalization Right. [online] www.foreignaffairs.com. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/persian-gulf/2010-05-01/getting-deradicalization-right.

Stern, J.E., McBride, M.K., Carroll, M., Baker, A. and Savoia, E. (2022). Practices and Needs in Reintegration Programs for Violent Extremist Offenders in the United States: The Probation Officer Perspective. [online] ideas.repec.org. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/e95zy.html.

United Nations Development Programme (2021). Section 3: Evaluation Plan Development. [online] web.undp.org, United Nations Development Programme, pp.1–13. Available at: http://web.undp.org/evaluation/guideline/section-3.shtml [Accessed 4 Jan. 2024].

van de Donk, M., Uhlmann, M. and Keijzer, F. (2020). PEER AND SELF REVIEW MANUAL FOR EXIT WORK Peer and Self Review Manual for Exit Work. [online] RAN Centre for Excellence.

van der Heide, L. and Schuurman, B. (2018). Reintegrating Terrorists in the Netherlands: Evaluating the Dutch approach. Journal for Deradicalization, [online] 0(17), pp.196–239. Available at: https://journals.sfu.ca/jd/index.php/jd/article/view/179/134 [Accessed 7 Jul. 2021].

van de Weert, A. and Eijkman, Q.A.M. (2018). Subjectivity in detection of radicalisation and violent extremism: A youth worker’s perspective. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 11(3), pp.1–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2018.1457069.

van de Wetering, D. and Hecker, T. (2023). The Interplay of Psychological Stress, Aggression, Identity, and Implicit Knowledge Findings from a Qualitative Study of Disengagement and Deradicalisation Processes Involving Former Right-Wing Extremists. In: A. Kaya, A. Benevento and M. Koca, eds., Nativist and Islamist radicalism : anger and anxiety. Oxon; New York: Routledge, pp.71–94.

van Leeuwen, A. (2023). Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation in the CT and P/CVE Field. The International Centre for Counter-Terrorism , pp.1–25.

Wichmann, F. (2021). Dos and don’ts of involving formers in PVE/CVE work. [online] journal-exit.de. Available at: https://journal-exit.de/formers-in-pve-cve/.

Evidence or Instinct? An Overview of International Exploration of the Impact Assessment Practices of Intervention Providers Supporting Leaving Extremism

Authors

Keywords:

Abstract

References

Downloads

Published

Issue

Section

License

Information