Organizational Approaches to Incel Deradicalization: A Systematic Review
Keywords:
Incel, Deradicalization, Disengagement, Systematic ReviewAbstract
The involuntary celibate (incel) movement represents a growing domestic extremist threat characterized by misogynistic ideology and decentralized online radicalization. Despite numerous deradicalization programs addressing Islamist and far-right extremism, specialized frameworks targeting incel ideology remain largely absent. This systematic review employed the PICO framework to examine existing literature on incel intervention strategies, identifying organizational approaches and clinical responses. After screening 2,139 studies across 11 databases, only four studies met inclusion criteria, representing exploratory efforts and clinical observations rather than established program evaluations. Three critical themes emerged: barriers to intervention (including fragmented service coordination, unclear policies, and institutional limitations); changes in clinical approaches (requiring specialized engagement, digital literacy, and ideological expertise); and professional requirements (emphasizing interdisciplinary training and nuanced risk assessment). The scarcity of literature reflects not merely an understudied domain, but a fundamental absence of formalized deradicalization programs specifically designed for incel extremism, leaving practitioners without evidence-based frameworks. Findings emphasize the need for multi-level interventions addressing both ideological and psychological factors through upstream prevention, specialized clinical training, psychosocial support, and community engagement. Effective responses require distinguishing between individuals holding incel beliefs and those who have undergone radicalization, necessitating tailored approaches across the Social Ecological Model's micro (individual), meso (organizational), and macro (policy) levels. This research provides a foundation for developing evidence-based programs that address the unique challenges of online radicalization while accounting for the spectrum of incel identity and engagement.
References
Abbas, T., & McNeil-Willson, R. (2025). Digital Masculinities in Crisis: Understanding Virtual Pathways to Male Extremism Across Communities. Men and Masculinities, 1097184X251387631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X251387631
Altier, M. B., Leonard Boyle, E., & Horgan, J. G. (2021). Returning to the fight: An empirical analysis of terrorist reengagement and recidivism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 33(4), 836–860. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2019.1679781
Altier, M. B., Thoroughgood, C. N., & Horgan, J. G. (2014). Turning away from terrorism: Lessons from psychology, sociology, and criminology. Journal of Peace Research, 51(5), 647–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343314535946
Arbeit, M. R., Dufault, A. E., Burnham, S. L. F., Onuoha, A. C., Wanjuki, W., & de Four, D. (2025). Early Intervention Against Male Supremacist Influences Among College Students: “It’s Really Not a Program That Exists.” Violence Against Women, 10778012251329186. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012251329186
Baker Beall, C. (2013). The evolution of the European Union's 'fight against terrorism' discourse: Constructing the terrorist 'other.' Cooperation and Conflict, 49(2), 212–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836713483411
Barrelle, K. (2015). Pro-integration: Disengagement from and life after extremism. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 7(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2014.988165
Bertram, L. (2015). How Could a Terrorist be De-Radicalised? Journal for Deradicalization, 15/16(5), 120-149, ISSN:2363-9849.
Boldt, N. N., Burgdorff, N., & Lund, P. C. (2025). ‘Life of An Incel’: A thematic Analysis of Narrative Interviews with Incels. Culture & Psychology, 1354067X251411494. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X251411494
Brown, K. E. (2021). Feminist responses to violent extremism. In Routledge Handbook of Feminist Peace Research. Routledge.
Broyd, J., Boniface, L., Parsons, D., Murphy, D., & Hafferty, J. D. (2023). Incels, violence and mental disorder: A narrative review with recommendations for best practice in risk assessment and clinical intervention. BJPsych Advances, 29(4), 254–264. https://doi.org/10.1192/bja.2022.15
Buran, L., Jurasz, O., & Belassie Page, T (2025). The case for investing in primary prevention of men's violence against women and girls. White Ribbon UK and Centre for Protecting Women Online. https://oro.open.ac.uk/107477/
Canter, D., Sarangi, S., & Youngs, D. (2012). Terrorists' personal constructs and their roles: A comparison of the three Islamic terrorists. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 19(1), 160–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02067.x
Center for Extremism. (2018). When Women are the Enemy: The Intersection of Misogyny and White Supremacy. Anti-Defamation League. https://www.adl.org/resources/report/when-women-are-enemy-intersection-misogyny-and-white-supremacy
Cherney, A., Putra, I. E., Putera, V. S., Erikha, F., & Magrie, M. F. (2021). The push and pull of radicalization and extremist disengagement: The application of criminological theory to Indonesian and Australian cases of radicalization. Journal of Criminology, 54(4), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/26338076211034893
Clubb, G., Barnes, E., O’Connor, R., Schewe, J., & Davies, G. A. (2019). Revisiting the de-radicalisation or disengagement debate: Public attitudes to the re-integration of terrorists. Journal for Deradicalization, (21), 84–116.
Collins, C. J., Murphy, M G., Reid, K, & and Clark, J. J. (2024). Incel Perpetrated Violence: Distal and Proximal Risk Factors and Pathways. Deviant Behavior, 0(0), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2024.2417824
Corner, E., & Gill, P. (2015). A false dichotomy? Mental illness and lone-actor terrorism. Law and Human Behavior, 39(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000102
Costa, V., Liberado, P., Esgalhado, G., Cunha, A. I., & Neves, P. das. (2021). One Size Does Not Fit All: Exploring the Characteristics of Exit Programmes in Europe. Journal for Deradicalization, 28, 1–38.
Costello, W., & Buss, D. M. (2023). Why isn't There More Incel Violence? Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 9(3), 252–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-023-00220-3
Cumpston, M. S., McKenzie, J. E., Thomas, J., & Brennan, S. E. (2021). The use of 'PICO for thesis' and methods for synthesis without meta-analysis: Protocol for a survey of current practice in systematic reviews of health interventions. F1000Research, 9, 678. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.24469.2
DeCook, J. R., & and Kelly, M. (2021). Interrogating the "incel menace": Assessing the threat of male supremacy in terrorism studies. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 15(3), 706–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2021.2005099
Doosje, B., Moghaddam, F. M., Kruglanski, A. W., de Wolf, A., Mann, L., & Feddes, A. R. (2016). Terrorism, radicalization and de-radicalization. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.06.008
Dufault, A. E., Berger, N. P., & Arbeit, M. R. (2024). College Students’ Anticipated Bystander Intervention Actions Against Male Supremacism: “Something More Needs to be Done.” Journal of Adolescent Research, 07435584241297138. https://doi.org/10.1177/07435584241297138
Ebaugh, H. R. F. (1988). Becoming an Ex: The Process of Role Exit (R. K. Merton, Ed.). University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/B/bo5952245.html
Enders, W., Sandler, T., & Gaibulloev, K. (2011). Domestic versus transnational terrorism: Data, decomposition, and dynamics. Journal of Peace Research, 48(3), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343311398926
Eriksen, M., & Frandsen, T. (2018). The impact of patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) as a search strategy tool on literature search quality: A systematic review. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(4), 420–431. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.345
Finch, J., Jönsson, J. H., Kamali, M., & McKendrick, D. (2019). Social work and countering violent extremism in Sweden and the UK. European Journal of Social Work, 25(1), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2019.1657803
Finch, J., & McKendrick, D. (2019). Securitising social work: Counter terrorism, extremism, and radicalisation. In S. A. Webb (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Critical Social Work (pp. 244–255). Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/The-Routledge-Handbook-of-Critical-Social-Work-1st-Edition/Webb/p/book/9781138578432
Finlay, L. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2(2), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200205
Frounfelker, R. L., Johnson-Lafleur, J., Montmagny Grenier, C., Duriesmith, D., & Rousseau, C. (2025). “Between the self and the other”: Clinical presentation of male supremacy in violent extremists. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 17(1), 67–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2023.2185277
Gheorghe, R. M. (2024). "Just be white (JBW)": Incels, race and the violence of whiteness. Affilia, 39(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/08861099221144275
Gheorghe, R. M., & Yuzva Clement, D. (2025). 'It's time to put the copes down and get to work': A qualitative study of incel exit strategies on r/IncelExit. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2023.2276485
Glace, A. M., Dover, T. L., & Zatkin, J. G. (2021). Taking the black pill: An empirical analysis of the "Incel." Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 22(2), 288–297. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000328
Halpin, M., Preston, K., Lockyer, D., & Maguire, F. (2024). A soldier and a victim: Masculinity, violence, and incels celebration of December 6th. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne de Sociologie, 61(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/cars.12460
Hoffman, B., Ware, Jacob, & and Shapiro, E. (2020). Assessing the threat of incel violence. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 43(7), 565–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2020.1751459
Holbrook, D., & Horgan, J. (2019). Terrorism and ideology: Cracking the nut. Perspectives on Terrorism, 13(6), 2–15. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26853737
Horgan, J. (2009). Deradicalization or disengagement? A process in need of clarity and a counterterrorism initiative in need of evaluation. International Journal of Social Psychology, 24(2), 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1174/021347409788041408
Horgan, J., Altier, M. B., Shortland, N., & Taylor, M. (2017). Walking away: The disengagement and de-radicalization of a violent right-wing extremist. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 9(2), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2016.1156722
Jugl, I., Lösel, F., Bender, D., & King, S. (2020). Psychosocial prevention programs against radicalization and extremism: A meta-analysis of outcome evaluations. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 13(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.5093/ejpalc2021a6
Khalil, J., Zeuthen, M., & Marsden, S. (2023). A guide to deradicalisation & disengagement programming. CREST. https://crestresearch.ac.uk/resources/guide-to-deradicalisation-disengagement-programming/
Kilanowski, J. (2017). Breadth of the socio-ecological model. Journal of Agromedicine, 22(4), 295–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2017.1358971
Knudsen, R. A. (2018). Measuring radicalisation: Risk assessment conceptualisations and practice in England and Wales. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 12(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2018.1509105
Koehler, D. (2016). Understanding deradicalization: Methods, tools and programs for countering violent extremism. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315649566
Koehler, D. (2025). What’s in a word? Revisiting the role of ideology in the practice of and scholarship on countering violent extremism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 37(7), 1015–1030. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2025.2484753
Koehler, D., & Fiebig, V. (2019). Knowing what to do: Academic and practitioner understanding of how to counter violent radicalization. Perspectives on Terrorism, 13(3), 44–62.
Koehler, D., Fiebig, V., & Jugl-Kuntzsch, I. (2025). Quality control and management in countering violent extremism programmes: A guideline. CREST, Spring (2025), 6-9. https://crestresearch.ac.uk/comment/quality-control-and-management-in-countering-violent-extremism-programmes-guideline/
LaFree, G., & Freilich, J. D. (2019). Government policies for counteracting violent extremism. Annual Review of Criminology, 2(Volume 2, 2019), 383–404. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024542
Lautz, Y. von, Bösing, E., Kart, M., & Stein, M. (2024). Influences of discrimination and stigmatization on secondary and tertiary Level P/CVE efforts – Insights from German practitioners into countering Islamist extremism. Journal for Deradicalization, 24(38), 122-167, ISSN: 2363-9849
Lewis, J., Marsden, S., Cherney, A., Zeuthen, M., Rahlf, L., Squires, C., & Peterscheck, A. (2024). Case management interventions seeking to counter radicalisation to violence and related forms of violence: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 20(2), e1386. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1386
Marsden, S. V. (2019). Countering violent extremism: A guide to good practice. Crest Security Review, Spring 2019(9). CREST. https://www.crestsecurityreview.com/article/countering-violent-extremism-a-guide-to-good-practice
Mattsson, C. (2021). The lock pickers, the gatekeepers, and the non-grievables: A case study of youth workers' roles in preventing violent extremism. Nordic Social Work Research, 13(2), 306–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2021.1976259
McCauley, C., & Moskalenko, S. (2017). Understanding political radicalization: The two-pyramids model. American Psychologist, 72(3), 205–216.
https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000062
McKendrick, D., & Finch, J. (2017). 'Downpressor man': Securitisation, safeguarding and social work. Critical and Radical Social Work, 5(3), 287-300. https://doi.org/10.1332/204986017X15029697482460
McMahon, K., Clark, I. N., Stensæth, K., Odell-Miller, H., Wosch, T., Bukowska, A., & Baker, F. A. (2022). Exploring shared musical experiences in dementia care: A worked example of a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 16094069221127509. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221127509
Misbah, M., & Munfarida, E. (2023). Deradicalization of Pesantren education in Indonesia. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 06(02). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i2-72
Mitchell, S. (2017). Deradicalization: Using triggers for the development of a US program. Journal for Deradicalization, 16/17(9), 101-125, ISSN: 2363-9849
Morrison, J. F., Silke, A., Maiberg, H., Slay, C., & Stewart, R. (2021). A systematic review of post-2017 research on disengagement and deradicalisation. London: Centre for Research and Evidence on Security Threats (CREST). https://crestresearch.ac.uk/resources/a-systematic-review-of-post-2017-research-on-disengagement-and-deradicalisation/
Moskalenko, S., González, J. F.-G., Kates, N., & Morton, J. (2022a). Incel ideology, radicalization and mental health: A survey study. The Journal of Intelligence, Conflict, and Warfare, 4(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.21810/jicw.v4i3.3817
Moskalenko, S., Kates, N., González, J. F.-G., & Bloom, M. (2022b). Predictors of radical intentions among incels: A survey of 54 self-identified incels. Journal of Online Trust and Safety, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.54501/jots.v1i3.57
Mufti, E. A., Lisdiyono, E., Sukmariningsih, R. M., Ardyantara, D. M., & Riyanto, O. S. (2022). Correctional institutions as a place of guidance to counter radicalism for terrorist prisoners in Indonesia. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 16(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.37506/ijfmt.v16i3.18272
O'Donnell, C., & Shor, E. (2022). "This is a political movement, friend": Why "incels" support violence. The British Journal of Sociology, 73(2), 336–351.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12923
O'Malley, R. L., & and Helm, B. (2022). The role of perceived injustice and need for esteem on incel membership online. Deviant Behavior, 44(7), 1026–1043. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2022.2133650
O'Malley, R. L., Holt, K., & Holt, T. J. (2020). An exploration of the involuntary celibate (incel) subculture online. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(7–8), NP4981–NP5008. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520959625
Raets, S. (2024). Desistance, disengagement, and deradicalization: A cross-field comparison. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 68(4), 389–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X221102802
Reiter, J., Doosje, B., & Feddes, A. R. (2021). Radicalization and deradicalization: A qualitative analysis of parallels in relevant risk factors and trigger factors. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 27(2), 268–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000493
Rottweiler, B., Clemmow, C., & Gill, P. (2021). Misogyny, violent extremism and interpersonal violence: Examining the mediating and contingent effects of revenge motivation, hypermasculinity, collective narcissism and group threats. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/sy84m
Rottweiler, B., Clemmow, C., & Gill, P. (2025). A common psychology of male violence? Assessing the effects of misogyny on intentions to engage in violent extremism, interpersonal violence and support for violence against women. Terrorism and Political Violence, 37(3), 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2023.2292723
Saminov, E. (2025). Preventing the spread of radicalization and extremist ideas among youth is a demand of our time. Pubmedia Social Sciences and Humanities, 2. https://doi.org/10.47134/pssh.v2i4.375
Schuurman, B. (2021). The role of beliefs in motivating involvement in terrorism: A response to Lorne L. Dawson’s article: Bringing religiosity back in: Critical reflection on the explanation of Western homegrown religious terrorism (Parts I & II). Perspectives on Terrorism, 15(5), 85–92.
Shall, S. (2023). Social work's relationship with the PREVENT duty. The Institute for Research and Innovation in Social Services. https://www.iriss.org.uk/resources/insights/social-works-relationship-prevent-duty
Sparks, B., Zidenberg, A. M., & Olver, M. E. (2022). Involuntary celibacy: A review of incel ideology and experiences with dating, rejection, and associated mental health and emotional sequelae. Current Psychiatry Reports, 24(12), 731–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-022-01382-9
Speckhard, A., Ellenberg, M., Morton, J., & Ash, A. (2021). Involuntary celibates' experiences of and grievance over Sexual exclusion and the potential threat of violence among those active in an online incel forum. Journal of Strategic Security, 14(2), 89–121. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27026635
Stanley, T., & Guru, S. (2015). Childhood radicalisation risk: An emerging practice issue. Practice, 27(5), 353–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/09503153.2015.1053858
Stephens, W., & Sieckelinck, S. (2020). Being resilient to radicalisation in PVE policy: A critical examination. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 13(1), 142–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2019.1658415
Subagyo, A. (2021). The implementation of the pentahelix model for the terrorism deradicalization program in Indonesia. Cogent Social Sciences, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1964720
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
Ulyana, Y. A., & Riyansyah, A. (2021). De-radicalization program: The case study of Indonesia. International Journal of Business, Economics, and Social Development, 2(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.46336/ijbesd.v2i2.130
van Broekhoven. (2018). Community-based preventive and remedial measures to prevent violent extremism: A human security approach to help transform conflicts, improve social cohesion and improve local security. International Annals of Criminology, 56(1–2), 198–219. https://doi.org/10.1017/cri.2018.10
Veldhuis, T. M. (2012). Designing rehabilitation and reintegration programmes for violent extremist offenders: a realist approach. ICCT The Hague Research Paper. http://www.icct.nl/download/file/ICCT Veldhuis Designing Rehabilitation Reintegration Programmes March 2012.pdf
Weisburd, D., Wolfowicz, M., Hasisi, B., Paolucci, M., & Andrighetto, G. (2022). What is the best approach for preventing recruitment to terrorism? Findings from ABM experiments in social and situational prevention. Criminology and Public Policy, 21(2), https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12579
Widya, B. (2020). Deradicalization in Indonesia: Implementation and challenges. Journal of Terrorism Studies, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.7454/jts.v2i1.1016
Williams, M. J. (2020). Preventing and countering violent extremism: Designing and evaluating evidence-based programs. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429441738
Williams, D. J., Arntfield, M., Schaal, K., & Vincent, J. (2021). Wanting sex and willing to kill: Examining demographic and cognitive characteristics of violent "involuntary celibates." Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 39(4), 386–401. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2512
Zempi, I., & Tripli, A. (2023). Listening to muslim students’ voices on the prevent duty in british universities: A qualitative study. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 18(2), 230–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/17461979221077990
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Katherine Reid, Christopher J. Collins, Zohra Tasci

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The JD Journal for Deradicalization uses a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND) Licence. You are free to share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format under the following conditions:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, andindicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
