From Idea to Policy: Scandinavian Municipalities Translating Radicalization
Keywords:
Radicalization, Local Policymaking, Neo-institutional TheoryAbstract
Radicalization has emerged as a dominant idea for understanding processes that lead to extremist beliefs and behavior. As societal efforts to counter extremism have become increasingly decentralized, local policymakers are being confronted with the task of making sense of radicalization. Departing from neo-institutional theory, this paper explores how the idea of radicalization has been materialized in 60 Scandinavian (Denmark, Norway and Sweden) municipal policies that share the explicit aim of countering extremism. Most research on how radicalization has been conceptualized in policy focuses on the international and national levels. Instead, this paper provides a first large number analysis of how radicalization has been understood at the local level. A content analysis of the policies highlights the different definitions, explanatory factors and theories, models and checklists utilized. Findings show the considerable variance between municipal translations of radicalization. In some cases, the processual properties usually attributed to radicalization are contested as radicalization is portrayed as a mere outcome. A total of 66 different explanatory factors for radicalization are noticed by the municipalities, transforming most forms of deviant social and cultural statuses, psychological conditions and ideological positions to possible explanatory factors. Although the municipalities to a certain degree utilize the same labels for popular theories, models and checklists, this paper demonstrates that the content varies as they are transferred between contexts. The paper explains how and why such local variance occurs and which institutional elements that constrains translations of radicalization.
References
Andersson Malmros, R., & Mattsson, C. (2017). Från ord till handlingsplan - En rapport om kommunala handlingsplaner mot våldsbejakande extremism. Stockholm, Sweden: Sveriges kommuner och landsting.
Atran, S. (2010). Talking to the enemy: Violent extremism, sacred values, and what it means to be human. London: Penguin UK.
Bertelsen, P. (2015). Danish preventive measures and de-radicalization strategies. The Aarhus model. Panorama Insights into Asian and European Affairs, 1, 241–253.
Borum, R. (2011). Radicalization into violent extremism II: A review of conceptual models and empirical research. Journal of Strategic Security, 4(4), 37–62.
Coolsaet, R. (2015). What drives Europeans to Syria, and to IS? Insights from the Belgian case (Gent, Academia Press). Retrieved 2018-05-18 from http://www.egmontinstitute.be/content/uploads/2015/03/75.pdf?type=pdf
Coolsaet, R. (2016). All radicalization is local. Retrieved 2018-05-18 from http://www.egmontinstitute.be/content/uploads/2016/05/ep84.pdf?type=pdf
Czarniawska, B. (2009). Emerging institutions: Pyramids or anthills? Organization Studies, 30(4), 423–441.
Czarniawska, B., & Joerges, B. (1996). Translating organizational change. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.
Czarniawska, B., & Sevón, G. (2005). Global ideas: How ideas, objects and practices travel in a global economy. Malmö, Sweden: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.
De Coensel, S. (2018). Processual models of radicalization into terrorism: A best fit framework synthesis. Journal for Deradicalization, (17), 89–127.
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
DK state document. (2009). En fælles och tryg fremtid. Handlingsplan om forebyggelse av ekstremistiske holdninger og radikalisering blandt unge. Retrieved 2018-03-07 from http://uim.dk/publikationer/en-faelles-og-tryg-fremtid-handlingsplan-om-forebyggelse-af-ekstremistiske-holdninger-og-radikalisering-blandt-unge
Dubois, A., & Gadde, L. E. (2002). Systematic combining: An abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research, 55(7), 553–560
Duriau, V., Reger, R., & Pfarrer, M. (2007). A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organization studies: Research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements. Organizational Research Methods, 10(1), 5–34.
Erlingsdóttir, G., & Lindberg, K. (2005). Isomorphism, isopraxism, and isonymism: Complementary or competing processes? In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevón (Eds.), Global ideas: How ideas, objects and practices travel in the global economy (pp. 47–71). Malmö, Sweden: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.
Gardell, M., Lööw, H. & Dahlberg-Grundberg, M. (2017). Den Ensamme terroristen? Om lone-wolves, närhat och brinnande flyktingförläggningar. Stockholm, Sweden: Ordfront.
Gustafsson, L., & Ranstorp, M. (2017). Swedish foreign fighters in Syria and Iraq. Stockholm, Sweden: CATS, Försvarshögskolan.
Hafez, M., & Mullins, C. (2015). The radicalization puzzle: A theoretical synthesis of empirical approaches to homegrown extremism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 38(11), 958–975.
Hardy, K. (2018). Comparing theories of radicalisation with countering violent extremism policy. Journal for Deradicalization, (15), 76–110.
Heath-Kelly, C. (2013). Counter-terrorism and the counterfactual: Producing the “radicalisation” discourse and the UK PREVENT strategy. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 15 (3), 394–415.
Heath-Kelly, C., Jarvis, L., & Baker-Beall, C. (2015). Counter-radicalisation: Critical perspectives. NY: Routledge.
Hedmo, T., Sahlin-Andersson, K., & Wedlin, L. (2005). Fields of imitation: The global expansion of management education. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevón (Eds.) Global ideas: How ideas, objects and practices travel in a global economy (pp. 190–212). Malmö, Sweden: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.
Justis- og politidepartementet. (2010). Felles trygghet – felles ansvar. Retrieved 2017-03-07 from https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/jd/vedlegg/handlingsplaner/hp_ekstr emisme.pdf
Kundnani, A. (2012). Radicalisation: The journey of a concept. Race & Class, 54(2), 3–25.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lindekilde, L. (2012). Introduction: Assessing the effectiveness of counter-radicalisation policies in northwestern Europe. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 5(3), 335–344.
Lowi, T. J. (1972). Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public Administration Review, 32(4), 298–310.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
Nasser-Eddine, M., Garnham, B., Agostino, K. & Caluya, G. (2011). Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) Literature Review. Canberra: Australian Government, Department of Defence
Neumann, P. (2008). Perspective on radicalization and political violence. London, England: The International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation and Political Violence.
Neumann, P. (2013). The trouble with radicalization. International Affairs, 89(4), 873–893.
Neumann, P., & Kleinmann, S. (2013). How rigorous is radicalization research? Democracy and Security, 9(4), 360–382.
Norwegian government. (2016). Radikaliseringsprosessen. Retrieved 2018-08-25 from https://www.regjeringen.no/no/sub/radikalisering/veileder/begreper-ord-og-uttrykk/radikaliseringstunnellen/id2399043/
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (2003). External control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Politiets Sikkerhetstjenstene. (2016). Temarapport: Hvilken bakgrunn har personer som frekventerer ekstreme islamistiske miljöer i Norge för de blir radikalisert. Oslo, Norway: Politiets sikkerhetstjeneste.
Ramboll. (2018). Kortlægning af kommunernes indsats til forebyggelse af ekstremisme og radikalisering. Retrieved 2019-01-10 from https://stopekstremisme.dk/filer/kortlaegning-af-kommunernes-indsats.pdf
Radicalisation Awareness Network. (2016a). Developing a local prevent framework and guiding principles. Retrieved 2017-05-16 from https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/networks/radicalisation_awareness_network/ran-papers/docs/policy_paper_developing_local_prevent_framework_guiding_112016_en.pdf
Radicalisation Awareness Network. (2016b). The root causes of violent extremism. Brussels, Belgium: EU Commission.
Sahlin-Andersson, K. (1996). Imitating by editing success the construction of organizational fields. In B. Czarniawska & B. Joerges (Eds.), Translating organizational change (pp. 69–92). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.
Sahlin-Andersson, K., & Wedlin, L. (2008). Circulating ideas imitation, translation and editing. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 218–242). London, England: Sage.
Schmid, A. P. (2013). Radicalisation, de-radicalisation, counter-radicalisation: A conceptual discussion and literature review. Retrieved 2017-03-10 from http://www.icct.nl/download/file/ICCT-Schmid-Radicalisation- De-Radicalisation-Counter-Radicalisation-March-2013.pdf
Schuurman, B. W., & Taylor, M. (2018). Reconsidering radicalization: Fanaticism and the link between ideas and violence. Perspectives on Terrorism, 12(1), 3–22.
Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations: Vol. 3. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
SE state document 2011/12:44. Handlingsplan för att värna demokrati mot våldsbejakande extremism. Retrieved from http://www.regeringen.se/49bb8c/contentassets/441d6f98b4e340d3a1a975d66c3e81f6/han dlingsplan-for-att-varna-demokratin-mot-valdsbejakande-extremism-skr.-20111244
SE state document, 2014/15:144. Åtgärder för att göra samhället mer motståndskraftigt mot våldsbejakande extremism. Retrieved 2017-05-10 from http://www.regeringen.se/contentassets/0ab9597659f24c05a918caa7916b6048/skrivelse- 141514400webb.pdf
Sedgwick, M. (2010). The concept of radicalization as a source of confusion. Terrorism and Political Violence, 22(4), 479–494.
Sellers, J., & Lidström, A. (2007). Decentralization, local government, and the welfare state. Governance, 20(4), 609–632.
Selznick, P. (1948). Foundations of the theory of organization. American Sociological Review, 13(1), 25–35.
Smith, D. L., & Lipsey, C. M. (1976). Public opinion and penal policy. Criminology, 14(1), 113–124.
Strang, D., & Meyer, J. (1993). Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory and Society, 22(4), 487–511.
The Swedish Security Police, & The Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention. (2009). Våldsam politisk extremism: Antidemokratiska grupperingar på yttersta höger- och vänsterkanten. Stockholm, Sweden: Fritze.
Van De Weert, A., & Eijkman, Q. (2018). Subjectivity in detection of radicalisation and violent extremism: A youth worker’s perspective. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression. DOI: 10.1080/19434472.2018.1457069
Van Heelsum, A., & Vermeulen, F. (2017). Cities’ policies: The work of European cities to counter Muslim radicalisation. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 19(1), 161–179.
Vermeulen, F. (2014). Suspect communities—targeting violent extremism at the local level: Policies of engagement in Amsterdam, Berlin, and London. Terrorism and Political Violence, 26(2), 286–306.
Vermeulen, F., & Bovenkerk, F. (2012). Engaging with violent Islamic extremism: Local policies in Western European cities. The Hague, the Netherlands: Eleven International.
Wedlin, L., & Sahlin, K. (2017). The imitation and translation of management ideas. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. Lawrence, & R. Meyer (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 102–127). London, England: Sage.
Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. New York, NY: Random House.
Wolman, H. (1981). The determinants of program success and failure. Journal of Public Policy, 1(4), 433–464.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The JD Journal for Deradicalization uses a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND) Licence. You are free to share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format under the following conditions:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, andindicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
