Research Note: ‘How Can I Get Them Offstage?’ – Critical Reflections on a Researcher’s Approach to Qualitative Data Collection with Social Workers Involved in Preventing Violent Extremism in Norway
Keywords:
Social Work, Qualitative Research, Violent Extremism, Critical ReflectionAbstract
Researching sensitive topics, such as individuals about whom concern for radicalisation and violent extremism has been raised, demands a thoroughly contemplated approach. This is necessary for establishing trust with and accessing the research project’s target group. As many projects are directed at professionals involved in the efforts to prevent violent extremism, and some of these workers have been found to struggle with this issue, the question should also be raised of how to approach these individuals in research. This paper draws on my experience from fieldwork throughout 2018, during which qualitative research was carried out through 17 in-depth interviews and two focus group interviews with experienced social workers involved in preventing radicalisation and violent extremism in Norway. This reflection started early in the data collection from the observation of participants being ‘onstage’ during interviews, appearing disconnected from their story. Applying Fook and Gardner’s framework for critically reflective practice throughout the research process brought forth insights into researcher behaviour and sensitivity. ‘Warming them up’ and the ‘specificity of practitioner experience’ emerged as methodological themes from this reflective analytical process. These findings share commonalities with sensitive client work and research targeting individuals at risk of radicalisation; the researcher must be patient and thoughtful before he or she starts digging. The responsibility for the lack of rich descriptions therefore belongs to the researcher, who must cast a critical eye on his or her own research practice. In addition, asking specific questions raises concerns about the findings’ validity if probing and closed-ended questions are not balanced with open-ended ones.
References
Anderson, C. (2010). Presenting and Evaluating Qualitative Research. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 74(8), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj7408141
Bennett, N. (2019). One Man’s Radical: The Radicalisation Debate and Australian Counterterrorism Policy. Security Challenges, 15(1), 47–62. JSTOR.
Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475
Brewer, J. D. (2012). Researching Sensitive Topics. In S. Becker, A. Bryman, & H. Fergusson (Eds.), Understanding Research for Social Policy and Practice (pp. 69–73). Policy Press.
Brink, H. I. L. (1993). Validity and reliability in qualitative research. Curationis, 16, 35–38. https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v16i2.1396
Brown, J. (1996). Police research: Some critical issues. In F. Leishman, B. Loveday, & S. P. Savage (Eds.) Core issues in policing. Longman.
Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed). Oxford University Press.
Burkett, K. W., & Morris, E. J. (2015). Enabling Trust in Qualitative Research With Culturally Diverse Participants—ScienceDirect. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 29(1), 108–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2014.06.
Carter, S., Kensington-Miller, B., & Courtney, M. (2016). Doctoral Supervision Practice: What’s the Problem and How Can We Help Academics? Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v5i1.235
Chisholm, T., & Coulter, A. (2017). Safeguarding and radicalisation (p. 50) [Research Report]. UK Department for Education.
Dahlberg, K., Dahlberg, H., & Nyström, M. (2008). Reflective Lifeworld Research (2nd edtition). Studentlitteratur.
DeJonckheere, M., & Vaughn, L. M. (2019). Semistructured interviewing in primary care research: A balance of relationship and rigour. Family Medicine and Community Health, 7(2), e000057. https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2018-000057
Dempsey, L., Dowling, M., Larkin, P., & Murphy, K. (2016). Sensitive Interviewing in Qualitative Research: SENSITIVE INTERVIEWING. Research in Nursing & Health, 39(6), 480–490. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21743
DiCicco‐Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical Education, 40(4), 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x
Dickson-Swift, V., James, E. L., Kippen, S., & Liamputtong, P. (2008). Risk to Researchers in Qualitative Research on Sensitive Topics: Issues and Strategies. Qualitative Health Research, 18(1), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307309007
Drake, P., & Heath, L. (2010). Practitioner Research at Doctoral Level: Developing Coherent Research Methodologies (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203841006
Dryden, M. (2017). Radicalisation: The Last Taboo in Safeguarding and Child Protection? Assessing Practitioner Preparedness in Preventing the Radicalisation of Looked-After Children. Journal for Deradicalization, 13, 101–136.
Ducharme, L. J., Knudsen, H. K., & Roman, P. M. (2007). Emotional Exhaustion and turnover intention in human service occupations: The protective role of coworker support.. Sociological Spectrum, 28(1), 81–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732170701675268
Fook, J. (2015). Reflective Practice and Critical Reflection. In J. Lishman (Ed.), Handbook for Practice Learning in Social Work and Social Care, Third Edition (Third, pp. 440–454). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Fook, J., & Gardner, F. (2007). Practicing Critical reflection. A Resource Handbook. Open University Press.
Grønnerød, J. S., & Hellevik, P. M. (2016). Radikalisering og psykisk helse – En kunnskapsoppsummering (4 / 2016). Nasjonalt kunnskapssenter om vold og traumatisk stress.
Guest, G., Namey, E. E., & Mitchell, M. L. (2012). Collecting Qualitative Data: A Field Manual for Applied Research. SAGE Publications.
Hales, A. H., & Williams, K. D. (2018). Marginalized Individuals and Extremism: The Role of Ostracism in Openness to Extreme Groups: Ostracism and Extreme Groups. Journal of Social Issues, 74(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12257
Hughes, J. M. (2010). The Role of Supervision in Social Work: A critical analysis. Critical Social Thinking: Policy and Practice, 2, 59–77.
Ixer, G. (2003). Developing the relationship between reflective practice and social work values. Journal of Practice Teaching, 5(1), 7–22.
Jamshed, S. (2014). Qualitative research method-interviewing and observation. Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy, 5(4), 87–88. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.141942
Jasko, K., LaFree, G., & Kruglanski, A. (2017). Quest for Significance and Violent Extremism: The Case of Domestic Radicalization. Political Psychology, 38(5), 815–831. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12376
Kingsley, J., Phillips, R., Townsend, M., & Henderson‐Wilson, C. (2010). Using a Qualitative Approach to Research to Build Trust Between a Non‐Aboriginal Researcher and Aboriginal Participants (Australia). Qualitative Research Journal, 10(1), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ1001002
Kruglanski, A., Jasko, K., Webber, D., Chernikova, M., & Molinario, E. (2018). The Making of Violent Extremists. Review of General Psychology, 22(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000144
Larsen, J. F. (2020). Talking about radicalization. Nordic Journal of Criminology, 21(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/2578983X.2019.1685805
Leung, L. (2015). Validity, reliability, and generalizability in
qualitative research. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 4(3), 324–327. https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.161306
Lid, S., Winswold, M., Søholt, S., Hansen, S. J., Heierstad, G., & Klausen, J. E. (2016). Forebygging av radikalisering og voldelig ekstremisme. Hva er kommunenes rolle? (No. 2; NIBR-Rapport, pp. 1–289). NIBR.
Lombardi, M., Rajab, Ī. A., Chin, V., Dandurand, Y., Divitiis, V. de, & Burato, A. (Eds.). (2015). Countering radicalisation and violent extremism among youth to prevent terrorism. IOS Press.
Manathunga, C. (2005). The development of research supervision: “Turning the light on a private space.” International Journal for Academic Development, 10(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440500099977
Mann, S. (2016). The research interview: Reflective practice and reflexivity in research processes. Palgrave Macmillan.
Marais, C., & Van der Merwe, M. (2016). Relationship building during the initial phase of social work intervention with child clients in a rural area. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 52(1), 145–166. https://doi.org/10.15270/52-2-498
Mason, J. (2002). Researching Your Own Practice: The Discipline of Noticing. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203471876
Neumann, P. R. (2013). The trouble with radicalization.
International Affairs, 89(4), 873–893. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12049
Noble, H., & Smith, J. (2015). Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. Evidence Based Nursing, 18(2), 34–35. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2015-102054
Phillippi, J., & Lauderdale, J. (2018). A Guide to Field Notes for Qualitative Research: Context and Conversation. Qualitative Health Research, 28(3), 381–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317697102
Råheim, M., Magnussen, L. H., Sekse, R. J. T., Lunde, Å., Jacobsen, T., & Blystad, A. (2016). Researcher–researched relationship in qualitative research: Shifts in positions and researcher vulnerability. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 11. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v11.30996
Ramage, M. (2017). Learning and Change in the Work of Donald Schön: Reflection on Theory and Theory on Reflection. In D. B. Szabla, W. A. Pasmore, M. A. Barnes, & A. N. Gipson (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Organizational Change Thinkers (pp. 1–15). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49820-1_57-1
Rambøll Management Consulting. (2017). Efforts to prevent extremism in the nordic countries. Mapping. Rambøll Management Consulting.
Reed, J., & Procter, S. (1995). Practitioner Research in Health Care. The Inside Story. Chapman & Hall.
Riemann, G. (2007). Etnographers of their own affairs. In S. White, J. Fook, & F. Gardner (Eds.), Critical Reflection in Health and Social Care. Open University Press; 02.02.2020.
Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (3rd ed). Teachers College Press.
Sieber, J. E., & Stanley, B. (1988). Ethical and professional dimensions of socially sensitive research. American Psychologist, 43(1), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.43.1.49
Silke, A., Reinares, F., Pascual, R. alonso, & Bjørgo, T. (2008). Radicalisation Processes Leading to Acts of Terrorism (p. 21). European Commission.
Sivenbring, J., & Malmros, R. A. (2020). Mixing Logics. Multiagency Approaches for Countering Violent Extremism. Segerstedtinstitutet, Gøteborgs Universitet.
Tracy, S. J. (2020). Qualitative Research Methods. John Wiley & Sons/Blackwell.
van de Weert, A., & Eijkman, Q. A. M. (2019). Subjectivity in detection of radicalisation and violent extremism: A youth worker’s perspective. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 11(3), 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2018.1457069
Webber, D., Babush, M., Schori-Eyal, N., Vazeou-Nieuwenhuis, A., Hettiarachchi, M., Bélanger, J. J., Moyano, M., Trujillo, H. M., Gunaratna, R., Kruglanski, A. W., & Gelfand, M. J. (2018). The road to extremism: Field and experimental evidence that significance loss-induced need for closure fosters radicalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(2), 270–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000111
Weber, L. R., & Carter, A. I. (2012). The Social Construction of Trust. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Weinstein, B., Levine, M., Kogan, N., Harkavy-Friedman, J., & Miller, J. M. (2000). Mental health professionals' experience reporting suspected child abuse and maltreatment.. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24(10), 1317–1328.
Weller, S. (2017). Using internet video calls in qualitative (longitudinal) interviews: Some implications for rapport. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(6), 613–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1269505
Yürür, S., & Sarikaya, M. (2012). The Effects of Workload, Role Ambiguity, and Social Support on Burnout Among Social Workers in Turkey. Administration in Social Work, 36(5), 457–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/03643107.2011.613365
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The JD Journal for Deradicalization uses a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND) Licence. You are free to share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format under the following conditions:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, andindicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.