Gazing inwards: A Discussion of the Potential of Norwegian Social Workers to Counteract the Negative Looping Effect of Radicalisation Labels
Keywords:
Radicalization, Violent Extremism, Social Work, Visiting Clients, Interactive KindsAbstract
European countries have adopted a multidisciplinary approach to ensure the prevention of violent extremism (PVE) and radicalisation related to social work, which has led to concerns that social workers are engaged in the surveillance of client groups. Our proposal is that social workers need to be involved in the PVE debate and determine ways to work within the PVE. As categorisation and labels impact the individuals being categorised and may even change them, the adoption of an approach motivated by curiosity based on the ‘typology’ of clients is suggested. Social workers should carry out a sensitive balancing act in cooperation with the police by explaining their roles and tasks to clients and clarifying confidentiality regulations. This has the potential to ensure that visiting clients in need of social workers’ services will remain open to engaging with such services. However, the execution of this approach is dependent upon social workers’ ability to be aware of and reflect upon the security dimensions that PVE entails. Thus, recommendations were formulated for the development of an approach centred on curiosity and client-centred practice. Adherence to these recommendations could help social workers communicate their true intent and remove any confusion, for the benefit of both themselves and their clients, regarding misconceptions of surveillance and policing.
References
Allen, S. R. (2018). Kinds behaving badly: Intentional action and interactive kinds. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1870-0
Atkinson, M., Jones, M., & Lamont, E. (2007). Multi-agency working and its implications for practice: A review of the literature (p. 111). CfBT Education Trust. https://www.nfer.ac.uk/multi-agency-working-and-its-implications-for-practice-a-review-of-the-literature/
Beelmann, A. (2020). A Social-Developmental Model of Radicalization: A Systematic Integration of Existing Theories and Empirical Research. International Journal of Conflict and Violence (IJCV), 14, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4119/ijcv-3778
Berg, I. K. (1989). Of visitors, complainants, and customers: Is there really such a thing as resistance. Family Therapy Networker, 13(1), 21–25.
Brown, K. E., & Saeed, T. (2015). Radicalization and counter-radicalization at British universities: Muslim encounters and alternatives. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38(11), 1952–1968. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2014.911343
Carthy, S. L., Doody, C. B., Cox, K., O’Hora, D., & Sarma, K. M. (2020). Counter-narratives for the prevention of violent radicalisation: A systematic review of targeted interventions. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 16(3), e1106. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1106
Cheung, C., Yu, K., Fung, G., Leung, M., Wong, C., Li, Q., Sham, P., Chua, S., & McAlonan, G. (2010). Autistic Disorders and Schizophrenia: Related or Remote? An Anatomical Likelihood Estimation. PLOS ONE, 5(8), e12233. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012233
Çilingir, S. (2019). The Securitisation—Integration Dilemma: The Case of British Muslims. Migration Letters, 17(1), 165–178. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.33182/ml.v17i1.688
Coppock, V., & McGovern, M. (2014). ‘Dangerous Minds’? Deconstructing Counter-Terrorism Discourse, Radicalisation and the ‘Psychological Vulnerability’ of Muslim Children and Young People in Britain. Children & Society, 28(3), 242–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12060
Dalgaard-Nielsen, A. (2010). Violent Radicalization in Europe: What We Know and What We Do Not Know. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 33(9), 797–814. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2010.501423
Dalgaard-Nielsen, A. (2013). Promoting Exit from Violent Extremism: Themes and Approaches. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 36(2), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2013.747073
De Pelecijn, L., Decoene, S., & Hardyns, W. (2021). The process toward (violent) extremism: An integrated theoretical model using a theory knitting approach. Psychology, Crime & Law, 0(0), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2021.2018437
Esterberg, M. L., Trotman, H. D., Brasfield, J. L., Compton, M. T., & Walker, E. F. (2008). Childhood and current autistic features in adolescents with schizotypal personality disorder. Schizophrenia Research, 104(1), 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2008.04.029
Førde, K., E., & Andersen, A. J. (2018). Bekymringsarbeidet. Dilemmaer og muligheter i lokal forebygging av radikalisering og voldelig ekstremisme i Norge (No. 4). Nasjonalt kunnskapssenter om vold og traumatisk stress. https://www.nkvts.no/rapport/bekymringsarbeidet-dilemmaer-og-muligheter-i-lokal-forebygging-av-radikalisering-og-voldelig-ekstremisme-i-norge/
Franc, R., & Pavlović, T. (2021). Inequality and Radicalisation—Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies. Terrorism and Political Violence, 0(0), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2021.1974845
Gambrill, E. (2003). A Client-Focused Definition of Social Work Practice. Research on Social Work Practice, 13(3), 310–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731503013003006
Goffman, E. (1986). Stigma Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Penguin Books.
Gøtzsche-Astrup, O. (2018). The time for causal designs: Review and evaluation of empirical support for mechanisms of political radicalisation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 39, 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.02.003
Grønnerød, J. S., & Hellevik, P. M. (2016). Radikalisering og psykisk helse – En kunnskapsoppsummering (4 / 2016). Nasjonalt kunnskapssenter om vold og traumatisk stress.
Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Harvard University Press.
Haugstvedt, H. (2019). Trusting the Mistrusted: Norwegian Social Workers’ Strategies in Preventing Radicalization and Violent Extremism. Journal for Deradicalization, 19, 149–184.
Haugstvedt, H. (2020). The role of social support for social workers engaged in preventing radicalization and violent extremism. Nordic Social Work Research, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2020.1806102
Haugstvedt, H. (2021). Managing the tension between trust and security: A qualitative study of Norwegian social workers’ experience with preventing radicalisation and violent extremism [Doctoral Thesis, University of Stavanger, Norway]. https://uis.brage.unit.no/uis-xmlui/handle/11250/2787719
Haugstvedt, H., & Gunnarsdottir, H. M. (2021). Managing role expectations and emotions in encounters with extremism: Norwegian social workers’ experiences. Qualitative Social Work, 14733250211051410. https://doi.org/10.1177/14733250211051410
Haugstvedt, H., & Tuastad, S. E. (2021). “It Gets a Bit Messy”: Norwegian Social Workers’ Perspectives on Collaboration with Police and Security Service on Cases of Radicalisation and Violent Extremism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2021.1970541
Heath-Kelly, C. (2012). Reinventing prevention or exposing the gap? False positives in UK terrorism governance and the quest for pre-emption. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 5(1), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2012.659910
Herz, M. (2016). SOCIALT ARBETE, PEDAGOGIK OCH ARBETET MOT SÅ KALLAD VÅLDSBEJAKANDE EXTREMISM (Rapport No. 1). Göteborgs Universitet. SegerstedsInstitutet.
Hurley-Hanson, A. E., Giannantonio, C. M., & Griffiths, A. J. (2020). The Stigma of Autism. In A. E. Hurley-Hanson, C. M. Giannantonio, & A. J. Griffiths (Eds.), Autism in the Workplace: Creating Positive Employment and Career Outcomes for Generation A (pp. 21–45). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29049-8_2
International Federation of Social Workers. (2018, February 7). Global Social Work Statement of Ethical Principles – International Federation of Social Workers. International Federation of Social Workers. https://www.ifsw.org/global-social-work-statement-of-ethical-principles/
Jahnke, S., Abad Borger, K., & Beelmann, A. (2022). Predictors of Political Violence Outcomes among Young People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Political Psychology, 43(1), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12743
Khalidi, M. A. (2010). Interactive Kinds. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 61(2), 335–360. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axp042
Kruse, E. L. (2019). Hvordan oppleves det å være gjenstand for en radikaliseringsbekymring? [Master thesis]. Høgskolen i Østfold, Avdeling for helse og velferd.
Leuprecht, C., Hataley, T., Moskalenko, S., & Mccauley, C. (2010). Containing the Narrative: Strategy and Tactics in Countering the Storyline of Global Jihad. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 5(1), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/18335300.2010.9686940
Lid, S., Winswold, M., Søholt, S., Hansen, S. J., Heierstad, G., & Klausen, J. E. (2016). Forebygging av radikalisering og voldelig ekstremisme. Hva er kommunenes rolle? (No. 2; NIBR-Rapport, pp. 1–289). NIBR.
Lindekilde, L., & Sedgwick, M. (2012). Impact of Counter-Terrorism on Communities: Denmark Background Report (pp. 1–73) [Country Background Report]. Institute for Strategic Dialogue.
Madriaza, P., Ponsot, A. S., & Marion, D. (2017). The Prevention of Radicalization Leading To Violence: An International Study Of Front-Line Workers And Prevention Issues. International Centre for the Prevention of Crime (ICPC).
Mattsson, C. (2018). Caught between the urgent and the comprehensible: Professionals’ understanding of violent extremism. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 11(1), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2017.1337327
Mattsson, C., Hammarén, N., & Odenbring, Y. (2016). Youth ‘at risk’: A critical discourse analysis of the European Commission’s Radicalisation Awareness Network Collection of approaches and practices used in education. Power and Education, 8(3), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757743816677133
McKendrick, D., & Finch, J. (2017). “Downpressor man”: Securitisation, safeguarding and social work. Critical and Radical Social Work, 5(3), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1332/204986017X15029697482460
Muna, W. (2020). Family-Based Networks: Soft Policy Tools in Countering Radicalisation to Violent Extremism. In S. Abdul Rehman Khan & Z. Yu (Eds.), Terrorism and Developing Countries. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89122
Pedersen, S., & Bang, J. (2016). Youth Development as Subjectified Subjectivity – a Dialectical-Ecological Model of Analysis. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50(3), 470–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-015-9337-z
Pfundmair, M. (2019). Ostracism promotes a terroristic mindset. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 11(2), 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2018.1443965
Ponsot, A. S., Autixier, C., & Madriaza, P. (2017). Factors Facilitating the Successful Implementation of a Prevention of Violent Radicalization Intervention as Identified by Front-Line Practitioners. Journal for Deradicalization, Nr. 18(16), 1–33.
Ragazzi, F. (2017). Countering terrorism and radicalisation: Securitising social policy? Critical Social Policy, 37(2), 163–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018316683472
Rambøll Management Consulting. (2018). Kortlægning af kommunernes indsats med forebyggelse af ekstremisme og radikalisering. Rambøll Management Consulting. https://stopekstremisme.dk/filer/kortlaegning-af-kommunernes-indsats.pdf
Rink, A., & Sharma, K. (2018). The Determinants of Religious Radicalization: Evidence from Kenya. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 62(6), 1229–1261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002716678986
Schclarek Mulinari, L. (2019). The Spectrum of Repression: Swedish Muslims’ Experiences of Anti-terrorism Measures. Critical Criminology, 27(3), 451–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-019-09462-8
Sedgwick, M. (2010). The Concept of Radicalization as a Source of Confusion. Terrorism and Political Violence, 22(4), 479–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2010.491009
Sestoft, D., Rasmussen, M. F., Vitus, K., & Kongsrud, L. (2014). The police, social services and psychiatry cooperation in Denmark—A new model of working practice between governmental sectors. A description of the concept, process, practice and experience. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 37(4), 370–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2014.02.007
Sieckelinck, S., Kaulingfreks, F., & De Winter, M. (2015). Neither Villains Nor Victims: Towards an Educational Perspective on Radicalisation. British Journal of Educational Studies, 63(3), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2015.1076566
Silva, D. M. D. (2017). The Othering of Muslims: Discourses of Radicalization in the New York Times, 1969–2014. Sociological Forum, 32(1), 138–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12321
Sivenbring, J., & Malmros, R. A. (2020). Mixing Logics. Multiagency Approaches for Countering Violent Extremism. Segerstedtinstitutet, Gøteborgs Universitet.
Sivenbring, J., & Malmros, R. A. (2021). Collaboration in Hybrid Spaces: The Case of Nordic Efforts to Counter Violent Extremism. Journal for Deradicalization, 29, 54–91.
Sjøen, M. M., & Mattsson, C. (2020). Preventing radicalisation in Norwegian schools: How teachers respond to counter-radicalisation efforts. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 13(2), 218–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2019.1693326
Solhjell, R. (2021). Practices in Multiagency Collaboration against Violent Extremism at the City Level: Nordic Approaches. Proceedings, 77(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2021077013
Stanley, T., Guru, S., & Coppock, V. (2017). A Risky Time for Muslim Families: Professionalised Counter-radicalisation Networks. Journal of Social Work Practice, 31(4), 477–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2017.1394829
Stanley, T., Guru, S., & Gupta, A. (2018). Working with PREVENT: Social Work Options for Cases of ‘Radicalisation Risk.’ Practice, 30(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/09503153.2017.1414176
Trimbur, M., Amad, A., Horn, M., Thomas, P., & Fovet, T. (2021). Are radicalization and terrorism associated with psychiatric disorders? A systematic review. Journal of Psychiatric Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.07.002
Vaughn, L. (2019). ‘Doing Risk’: Practitioner Interpretations of Risk of Childhood Radicalisation and the Implementation of the HM Government PREVENT Duty [Doctoral Thesis, University of Liverpool]. 13.02.2022. https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/3047974/1/935620654_MAR2019.pdf
Vergani, M., Iqbal, M., Ilbahar, E., & Barton, G. (2018). The Three Ps of Radicalization: Push, Pull and Personal. A Systematic Scoping Review of the Scientific Evidence about Radicalization Into Violent Extremism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2018.1505686
Vesterinen, T. (2020). Identifying the Explanatory Domain of the Looping Effect: Congruent and Incongruent Feedback Mechanisms of Interactive Kinds. Journal of Social Ontology, 6(2), 159–185. https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2020-0015
Walter, I. R. (2016, September 27). Solution-Focused Brief Therapy Client Types, and Their Relevance To Every Session. Family Therapy Basics. https://familytherapybasics.com/blog/2016/9/27/solution-focused-brief-therapy-client-types-and-their-relevance-to-every-session
Weine, S., & Kansal, S. (2019). What should global mental health do about violent extremism? Global Mental Health, 6, e14. https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2019.12
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Haugstvedt Håvard, Kruse Erik Lindbæk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The JD Journal for Deradicalization uses a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND) Licence. You are free to share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format under the following conditions:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, andindicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.