Being capable, yet helpless, in an egalitarian society: Are more educated individuals always less likely to support political violence?
Keywords:
Political Violence, Radicalization, Attitudes, Education, ISCEDAbstract
While some theoretical models of radicalization suggest that less educated individuals are drawn towards political violence due to grievances, others highlight circumstances in which more educated individuals may be more inclined to participate in violent collective actions. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis have not provided any firm conclusions regarding the role of education in determining radicalized attitudes and behaviors. The goal of this study was to provide a systematic overview of bivariate and interactive relationships between the level of education and support for political violence across countries. Therefore, multilevel regression analyses were applied to the World Value Survey data (seventh wave). Next to testing the linear relationship, the focus of this study was to test the relationship between education and support for political violence in circumstances which, according to theories of radicalization revolving around grievance, should undermine the protective role of education. Therefore, the cross-level interaction between education, attribution of success (to hard work or luck and connections) and egalitarianism in a society (measured on the country-level) was also tested. Results of the conducted analyses suggest that education has a weak protective role against support for political violence, although this role depends on the context. More precisely, education loses its protective role only among individuals who attribute success dominantly to luck and connections instead of hard work (i.e., perceive hard work as not an ineffective way of achieving success) and live in egalitarian societies.
Acknowledgement:
The work of Tomislav Pavlović was financed by the Croatian Science Foundation (HRZZ; DOK-01-2018).
References
Ajil, A. (2022). Politico-ideological violence: Zooming in on grievances. European journal of criminology, 19(2), 304-321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370819896223
Ajzen, I. (2002). Attitude assessment. In R. Fernandez Ballesteros (ed.), Encyclopedia of psychological assessment (pp. 110-115). London: Sage Publications.
Anokhin, S., & Schulze, W. S. (2009). Entrepreneurship, innovation, and corruption. Journal of business venturing, 24(5), 465-476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.06.001
Avnimelech, G., Zelekha, Y., & Sharabi, E. (2014). The effect of corruption on entrepreneurship in developed vs non-developed countries. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 20(3),237-262. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-10-2012-0121
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1-48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. In N.G. Fielding, A. Clarke, and R. Witt (eds.), The economic dimensions of crime (pp. 13-68). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Berrebi, C. (2007). Evidence about the link between education, poverty and terrorism among Palestinians. Peace economics, peace science and public policy, 13(1), 18-53. https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-8597.1101
Beršnak, J. V., & Prezelj, I. (2021). Recognizing youth radicalization in schools: Slovenian' frontline' school workers in search of a compass. International Sociology, 36(1), 49-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580920953333
Borum, R. (2014). Psychological vulnerabilities and propensities for involvement in violent extremism. Behavioral sciences & the law, 32(3), 286-305. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2110
Bosi, L., & Malthaner, S. (2015). Political violence. In D. Della Porta and M. Diani (eds.), The Oxford handbook of social movements, pp. 440-451. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199678402.001.0001
Cairns, J., & Inglis, B. (1989). A Content Analysis of Ten Popular History Textbooks for Primary Schools with Particular Emphasis on the Role of Women. Educational Review, 41(3), 221–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013191890410302
Cawvey, M., Hayes, M., Canache, D., & Mondak, J. J. (2017). Personality and Political Behavior. In W. R. Thompson (ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.221
Cinelli, C., Forney, A., & Pearl, J. (2021). A crash course in good and bad controls. Sociological Methods & Research, 00491241221099552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124122109955
Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., Knutsen, C. H., Lindberg, S. I., Teorell, J., Alizada, N.,… Ziblatt, D. (2021). V-Dem Dataset 2021 [Data set]. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. https://doi.org/10.23696/VDEMDS21
Craig, J. M. (2019). The potential mediating impact of future orientation on the ACE–crime relationship. Youth violence and juvenile justice, 17(2), 111-128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204018756470
Dalal, D. K., & Zickar, M. J. (2012). Some common myths about centering predictor variables in moderated multiple regression and polynomial regression. Organizational Research Methods, 15(3), 339-362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428111430540
Danzell, O. E., Yeh, Y. Y., & Pfannenstiel, M. (2020). Does education mitigate terrorism? Examining the effects of educated youth cohorts on domestic terror in Africa. Terrorism and political violence, 32(8), 1731-1752. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2018.1506336
De Coensel, S. (2018). Processual models of radicalization into terrorism: A best fit framework synthesis. Journal for Deradicalization, 17, 89-127. https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/8587457/file/8587458
De Mesquita, E. B. (2005). Conciliation, counterterrorism, and patterns of terrorist violence. International Organization, 59(1), 145-176. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818305050022
Diamantopoulos, A., Sarstedt, M., Fuchs, C., Wilczynski, P. i Kaiser, S. (2012). Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: a predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 434–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0300-3
Doekhie, J., Dirkzwager, A., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2017). Early attempts at desistance from crime: Prisoners' prerelease expectations and their postrelease criminal behavior. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 56(7), 473-493. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2017.1359223
Franc, R., & Pavlović, T. (2018). Systematic review of quantitative studies on inequality and radicalisation. DARE (725349). https://www.academia.edu/download/65929306/Systematic_Review.pdf
Franc, R., & Pavlović, T. (2021). Inequality and Radicalisation-Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies. Terrorism and Political Violence, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2021.1974845
Fussey, P. (2011). An economy of choice? Terrorist decision-making and criminological rational choice theories reconsidered. Security Journal, 24(1), 85-99. https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2009.11
Gurr, T. (1970). Why Men Rebel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Haerpfer, C., Inglehart, R., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano J., M. Lagos, P. Norris, E. Ponarin & B. Puranen (eds.). (2022). World Values Survey: Round Seven - Country-Pooled Datafile Version 5.0. Madrid, Spain & Vienna, Austria: JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat. https://doi.org/10.14281/18241.18
Hafez, M., & Mullins, C. (2015). The radicalization puzzle: A theoretical synthesis of empirical approaches to homegrown extremism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 38(11), 958-975. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2015.1051375
Heisig, J. P., & Schaeffer, M. (2019). Why you should always include a random slope for the lower-level variable involved in a cross-level interaction. European Sociological Review, 35(2), 258-279. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcy053
Hoffman, L. (2015). Longitudinal Analysis: Modeling Within-Person Fluctuation and Change. Routledge.
Hunter, S. T., Shortland, N. D., Crayne, M. P., & Ligon, G. S. (2017). Recruitment and selection in violent extremist organizations: Exploring what industrial and organizational psychology might contribute. American Psychologist, 72(3), 242-254. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000089
Kavanagh, J. (2011). Selection, availability, and opportunity: The conditional effect of poverty on terrorist group participation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 55(1), 106-132. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200271037471
Karademas, E. C. (2006). Self-efficacy, social support and well-being: The mediating role of optimism. Personality and individual differences, 40(6), 1281-1290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.10.019
Kay, A. C., Gaucher, D., Napier, J. L., Callan, M. J., & Laurin, K. (2008). God and the government: testing a compensatory control mechanism for the support of external systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.18
Kay, A. C., & Eibach, R. P. (2013). Compensatory Control and Its Implications for Ideological Extremism. Journal of Social Issues, 69(3), 564–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12029
Khalil, J., Horgan, J., & Zeuthen, M. (2022). The attitudes-behaviors corrective (ABC) model of violent extremism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 34(3), 425-450. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2019.1699793
Kristoffersen, I. (2018). Great expectations: Education and subjective wellbeing. Journal of Economic Psychology, 66, 64-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2018.04.005
Krueger, A. B., & Malečková, J. (2003). Education, poverty and terrorism: Is there a causal connection? Journal of Economic perspectives, 17(4), 119-144. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533003772034925
LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational research methods, 11(4), 815-852. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106296642
Lüdecke, D. (2021). sjPlot: Data Visualization for Statistics in Social Science. R package version 2.8.10. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sjPlot
Lüdecke, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Patil, I., Waggoner, P., & Makowski, D. (2021). performance: An R Package for Assessment, Comparison and Testing of Statistical Models. Journal of Open Source Software, 6(60), 3139. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03139
Marino, M. P. (2011). High school world history textbooks: An analysis of content focus and chronological approaches. The History Teacher, 44(3), 421-446. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41303993
Marquardt, K. (n.d.). V-Dem Methodology. https://v-dem.net/about/v-dem-project/methodology/
Maskaliūnaitė, A. (2015). Exploring the theories of radicalization. International Studies: Interdisciplinary Political and Cultural Journal (IS), 17(1), 9-26. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=480959
McCauley, C., & Moskalenko, S. (2017). Understanding political radicalization: The two-pyramids model. American Psychologist, 72(3), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000062
McGregor, I., Hayes, J., & Prentice, M. (2015). Motivation for aggressive religious radicalization: goal regulation theory and a personality × threat × affordance hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01325
Mondak, J. J., Hibbing, M. V., Canache, D., Seligson, M. A., & Anderson, M. R. (2010). Personality and Civic Engagement: An Integrative Framework for the Study of Trait Effects on Political Behavior. American Political Science Review, 104(1), 85–110. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055409990359
Moskalenko, S., & McCauley, C. (2009). Measuring political mobilization: The distinction between activism and radicalism. Terrorism and political violence, 21(2), 239-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546550902765508
Neumann, P. R. (2013). The trouble with radicalization. International affairs, 89(4), 873-893. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12049
Ofosu, G., & Tesfaye, B. (2018). Education, civic engagement and youth support for violence in fragile states: evidence from Somaliland. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/102983
Østby, G., Urdal, H., & Dupuy, K. (2019). Does education lead to pacification? A systematic review of statistical studies on education and political violence. Review of Educational Research, 89(1), 46-92. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543188002
Pisoiu, D., Zick, A., Srowig, F., Roth, V., & Seewald, K. (2020). Factors of Individual Radicalization into Extremism, Violence and Terror–the German Contribution in a Context. International Journal of Conflict and Violence (IJCV), 14(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.4119/ijcv-3803
R Core Team (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
Robbins, R. N., & Bryan, A. (2004). Relationships between future orientation, impulsive sensation seeking, and risk behavior among adjudicated adolescents. Journal of adolescent research, 19(4), 428-445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558403258860
Stuart, A., Thomas, E. F., & Donaghue, N. (2018). "I don't really want to be associated with the self-righteous left extreme": Disincentives to participation in collective action. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 6(1), 242-270. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v6i1.567
Tan, C., & Tan, L. S. (2014). The role of optimism, self-esteem, academic self-efficacy and gender in high-ability students. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(3), 621-633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.10.019
Wang, Y., Deng, C., & Yang, X. (2016). Family economic status and parental involvement: Influences of parental expectation and perceived barriers. School Psychology International, 37(5), 536-553. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034316667
Wolfowicz, M., Litmanovitz, Y., Weisburd, D., & Hasisi, B. (2020). A field-wide systematic review and meta-analysis of putative risk and protective factors for radicalization outcomes. Journal of quantitative criminology, 36(3), 407-447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-019-09439-4
Wolfowicz, M., Litmanovitz, Y., Weisburd, D., & Hasisi, B. (2021). Cognitive and behavioral radicalization: A systematic review of the putative risk and protective factors. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 17(3), e1174. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1174
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Tomislav Pavlović
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The JD Journal for Deradicalization uses a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND) Licence. You are free to share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format under the following conditions:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, andindicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
