Social Cohesion. A Basis for the Primary Prevention of Radicalisation in Cities.
Keywords:
Social Cohesion, Extremism, Radicalisation, Primary Prevention, Cities, Social Work, Community PolicingAbstract
Social cohesion has been widely used as a normative concept in European debate since the late 1990s. The contribution relates the concept to (primary prevention of) radicalisation and shows that a low degree of social cohesion enhances the danger of extremism. Our study in urban districts of Toulouse/France uses an adapted model of social cohesion that combines statistical data with qualitative data. The aim of the study is to describe the living circumstances in the districts in detail and to compare specific risks and protective factors in the territories. It can be shown that matching policies or social interventions may be developed–depending on the specific situation of each territory. Especially different perceptions of safety, the meaning of “feeling at home”, and the identification of inhabitants with “their” neighbourhood play an important role in terms of social cohesion and thus should be fostered in order to prevent violent, anti-democratic radicalisation. In socially marginalized neighbourhoods feelings of belonging may serve as a resource if municipality and the state executive manage to enter in a trustful relationship with the inhabitants.
References
Avenel C (2014) La ‘cohésion sociale’: de quoi parle-t-on? In Jean-Yves Guéguen (eds) L’année de l’action social 2015: Objectif autonomis , Paris:Dunod, pp. 119–136.
Bannister J, O’Sullivan A & Bates E (2019). Place and time in the Criminology of Place. Theoretical Criminology, 23(3), 315-332. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480617733726.
Berner H (2022) The Prevention of Extremism and the Role of Safety: Essay on a Well-Balanced Relationship Between Social Work and Law Enforcement. European Journal for Security Research, 7: 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41125-022-00082-y.
Bhui, K, Hicks, M, Lashley, M, & Jones, E (2012) A public health approach to understanding and preventing violent radicalization. BMC Medicine, 10(1), 1-8. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-10-16.
Böhnisch L (2017) Abweichendes Verhalten: Eine pädagogisch-soziologische Einführung. 5. Auflage.Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.
Bonacker T (2021) Situierte Sicherheit. Für einen methodologischen Situationismus in den Critical Security Studies. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen. 28. Jg. (2021) Heft 1: 5–34. https://doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2021-1-5.
Busher J and Macklin G (2015) Interpreting “cumulative extremism”: six proposals for enhancing conceptual clarity. Terrorism and Political Violence, vol. 27 (5): 884-905. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2013.870556.
Claridge T (2018) Functions of social capital. Bonding, bridging, linking. Social Capital Research (2018): 1–7.
Clemmow, C, Bouhana, N, Marchment, Z & Gill, P (2022). Vulnerability to radicalisation in a general population: a psychometric network approach. Psychology, Crime & Law, 1-29. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2022.2027944.
Conti B (2020) Case studies of interactive radicalisation France, Research results, DARE: Dialogue about Radicalisation and equality.
Council of Europe (2010) New Strategy and Council of Europe Action Plan for Social Cohesion. Online: https://www.coe.int/t/dg3/socialpolicies/socialcohesiondev/source/RevisedStrategy_en.pdf.
Da Silva C, Trottier D, Amadio N, Domingo B, Sarg R & Benbouriche M (2023). Significance Quest: A Meta-Analysis on the Association Between the Variables of the 3N Model and Violent Extremism. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 0(0), 15248380231176056. doi:10.1177/15248380231176056
Dehbi C (2019) Community Oriented Policing in the European Union Today. Toolbox Series No 14. EUCPN Secretariat: Brussels.
Durkheim E (1893) De la division du travail social. Paris: PUF.
Castel R (1995) La métamorphose d ela question sociale. Paris: Fayard.
Eatwell R (2006) Community Cohesion and Cumulative Extremism in Contemporary Britain. The political Quaterly. Vol. 77 No. 2 April-June.
Epstein R and Kirszbaum T (2019) Ces quartiers dont on préfère ne plus parler: les métamorphoses de la politique de la ville (1977-2018), Parlement[s], Revue d'histoire politique, 2019/3 (N° 30), 23–46. DOI: 10.3917/parl2.030.0023.
Flick U (1987) Methodenangemessene Gütekriterien in der qualitativ-interpretativen Forschung. In: Bergold J Flick U, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Verhaltenstherapie e.V. (ed.): Ein-Sichten: Zugänge zur Sicht desSubjekts mittels qualitativer Forschung. Tübingen: dgvt-Verl., 247–262.
Franc R and Pavlović T (2018) Systematic review. Quantitative studies on inequality and radicalisation. Dialogue About Radicalisation and Equality (H2020 project).
Galea S, Ahern J, Resnick H, Kilpatrick D, Bucuvalas M, Gold J & Vlahov D (2002) `Psychological Sequelae of the September 11 Terrorist Attacks in New York City, The New England Journal of Medicne, March 28.
Ghosh P, Warfa N, McGilloway A, Ali I, Jones E and Bhui K (2013) Violent Radicalisation and Recruitment to Terrorism. Perspectives of Wellbeing and Social Cohesion of Citizens of Muslim Heritage. Sociology Mind 2013, Vol. 3, No 4: 290–297. DOI: 10.4236/sm.2013.34039.
Granovetter M (1985) Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91(3): 481–510.
Güntner S (2009) Bewegte Zeiten. Anmerkungen zur sozialen Kohäsion in europäischen Städten. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung Heft 6.2009: 379–393.
Helluin J-J (2000) La géographie prioritaire de la politique de la ville, un contour de la banlieue? / Geographical priorities of urban policy: an approach for defining problem suburbs? Géocarrefour. 2000/75-2: 117–122.
Ilan, J and Sandberg, S (2019). How ‘gangsters’ become jihadists: Bourdieu, criminology and the crime–terrorism nexus. European Journal of Criminology, 16(3), 278-294. doi:10.1177/1477370819828936.
INSEE (2020) Indice de Gini / Coefficient de Gini. Définition. https://www.insee.fr/fr/metadonnees/definition/c1551.
Jenson J (2010) Defining and Measuring Social Cohesion. UNRISD.
Jesse E and Mannewitz T (2018) Konzeptionelle Überlegungen. In: Jesse E, Mannewitz T (eds) Extremismusforschung. Handbuch für Wissenschaft und Praxis. Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, Bonn, pp. 11–22.
Kaufmann, J-L (2016) L’entretien compréhensive. 4th ed. Paris: Armand Colin.
Kaya A (2020) State of the Art on Radicalisation. Islamist and Nativist Radicalisation in Europe. Working Paper No 12. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3773199.
Koehler D (2017) A typology of ‘de-radicalisation’ programmes. In: Colaert L (ed) Deradicalisation: Insights for policy. Flemish Peace Institute, pp. 63–81.
Koller, HD (2012) Bildung anders denken. Einführung in die Theorie transformatorischer Bildungsprozesse. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Kruglanski AW, Bélanger JJ & Gunaratna R (2019) The Three Pillars of Radicalization: Needs, Narratives, and Networks. Oxford: Oxford Academic.
Linge, M, Sandberg, S, & Tutenges, S (2023). Confluences of Street Culture and Jihadism: The Spatial, Bodily, and Narrative Dimensions of Radicalization. Terrorism and Political Violence, 35(6), 1373-1388. doi:10.1080/09546553.2022.2042269.
Martin O (2010) Induction-déduction in Paugam Serge (ed), Les 100 mots de la sociologie, Paris: Presses universitaires de France, coll. « Que Sais-Je ? », pp. 13-14.
Maslow AH (1943) A theory of human motivation. Psychology Review 50(4): 370–396.
Mayring, Philipp (2023) Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung. 7th ed., Weinheim: Beltz.
McDonald K (2018) Radicalization, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Moyano Pacheco M. (2019) Radicalización terrorista. Gestión del riesgo y modelos de intervención. Madrid: Ed. Síntesis.
Nguyen N (2019) Suspect communities. Anti-muslim racism and the domestic war on terror. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Novy A, Swiatek CD and Moulaert F (2012) Social Cohesion: A Conceptual and Political Elucidation. Urban Studies. 49(9). July 2012. DOI: 10.1177/0042098012444878.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (1997) Beyond 2000. The New Social Policy Agenda. OECD, Paris.
ONPV (2022) Les quartiers prioritaires de la politique de la ville sur twitter, juillet 2022.
Park R, Burgess E (1921) Introduction to the Science of Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Poli A and Arun O (2019) Meta-ethnographic synthesis. Qualitative studies on inequality and radicalisation. Dialogue About Radicalisation and Equality (H2020 project).
Prioux C, Marillier M, Vuillermoz C, Vandentorren S, Rabet G, Petitclerc M, Baubet T, Stene LE, Pirard P & Motreff Y (2023) PTSD and Partial PTSD among First Responders One and Five Years after the Paris Terror Attacks in November 2015. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 4160. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054160.
Putnam RD (2000) Bowling alone. The collapse and revival of American community. New York. Simon and Schuster.
Ragazzi F (2016) Suspect community or suspect category? The impact of counter-terrorism as ‘policed multiculturalism’. Journal of ethnic and migration studies, 2016 vol. 42, No. 5, 724–741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2015.1121807.
Rat SWD (Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten) (2017) Forschungsethische Grundsätze und Prüfverfahren in den Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften. Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung: Berlin.
Schmidt A P (2018) Relationship between International Terrorism and Transnational Organised Crime 22 Years Later. ICCT Research paper August 2018 DOI: 10.19165/2018.1.06.
Spatschek C and Wolf-Ostermann, K (2009) Social Space Analyses and the Socio-Spatial Paradigm in Social Work. (Working paper-serien; Vol. 2009, No. 1). Socialhögskolan, Lunds universitet. Online: https://lucris.lub.lu.se/ws/portalfiles/portal/86075177/wp2009_1.pdf.
Stephens W and Sieckelinck, S (2021). Resiliences to radicalization: Four key perspectives. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 66, 100486. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2021.100486.
Stephens W, Sieckelinck S & Boutellier H (2021) Preventing violent extremism: a review of the literature. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 44:346–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2018.1543144.
Stigendal M (2019) Aiming at Social Cohesion in Cities to Transform Society. In: Nieuwenhuijsen M., Khreis H. (eds) Integrating Human Health into Urban and Transport Planning. A Framework. Springer, pp. 501–514.
Sutterlüty, F (2010) In Sippenhaft. Negative Klassifikationen in ethnischen Konflikten. Campus Verlag. Frankfurt a.M.
Tolila P (1995) La cohésion sociale menacée: enquête sur une inquiétante étrangeté, Le banquelt, n°6.
Toulouse Métropole (2022) Rapport d’analyse territoriale Toulouse Métropole. Cohésion sociale et violences radicales. [deleted due to anonymisation], Toulouse Métropole.
Truc G (2016) Sidérations. Une sociologie des attentats, Paris, PUF.
Vijaya RM, Wilent A, Cathcart J & Fiorellini R (2018) Economic underpinnings of violent extremism: A cross country exploration of repeated survey data. World Development 109 (2018): 401–412.
Wang P (2010) The crime–terror nexus: Transformation, alliance, convergence. Asian Social Science 6(6): 11–20.
Weine, S, Eisenman, D P, Kinsler, J, Glik, DC, & Polutnik, C (2017). Addressing violent extremism as public health policy and practice. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 9(3), 208-221. doi:10.1080/19434472.2016.1198413.
Wimelius, M E, Eriksson, M, Kinsman, J, Strandh, V & Ghazinour, M (2023). What is Local Resilience Against Radicalization and How can it be Promoted? A Multidisciplinary Literature Review. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 46(7), 1108-1125. doi:10.1080/1057610X.2018.1531532.
Woolcock M (2001) Microenterprise and Social Capital: A Framework for Theory, Research, and Policy. The Journal of Socio-Economics 30: 193–98.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Heiko Berner, Romain Bertrand
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The JD Journal for Deradicalization uses a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND) Licence. You are free to share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format under the following conditions:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, andindicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.