Research Note: The role of ideas in radicalization to terrorism: Ideology and narrative vs. diagnostic, prognostic, and motivational action frames
Keywords:
Radicalization, Terrorism, Ideology, Narrative, Collective Action Frame, Diagnostic Frame, Prognostic Frame, Motivational FrameAbstract
The concepts of ideology and narrative have become popular in efforts to understand the role of ideas in radicalization to terrorism. This review finds that definitions of these concepts in terrorism research are inconsistent and seldom linked with measurement, and that references to these concepts can often be interpreted as one or more of the three dimensions of a collective action frame. These three dimensions--diagnostic, prognostic, and motivational framing--are relatively easy to define and measure; poll items tapping the three dimensions can track progress in the war of ideas against terrorism. Munson’s (2008) study of the anti-abortion movement in the U.S. identified four prognostic frames (politics, education, services, direct action) competing within the same anti-abortion diagnostic frame. The same four prognostic frames can be found competing within Islamist and Extreme Right movements. The distinction between diagnostic and prognostic frames leads to the suggestion that P/CVE programs should contest violent prognostic frames rather than contesting the diagnostic frames that support both violent and nonviolent prognostic frames. The review concludes with a residual puzzle: why have ideology and narrative been popular concepts in terrorism research despite their empirical weaknesses, while diagnostic, prognostic, and motivational action frames have been relatively neglected despite their empirical promise?
References
Ackerman, G. A. & Burnham, M. (2019). Towards a definition of terrorist ideology. Terrorism and Political Violence (22 April). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09546553.2019.1599862
Allen, S., McCright, A. M., & Dietz, T. (2017). A social movement identity instrument for integrating survey methods into social movements research. SAGE Open, 7(2).
Aronson, E. (1969). The theory of cognitive dissonance: a current perspective. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press.
Bélanger, J. J., Adam-Troian J., Nisa, C.F., & Schumpe, B.M. (2022). Ideological passion and violent activism: The moderating role of the significance quest. British Journal of Psychology, 113(4), 917-937.
Benford, R. D. & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 611-639.
Berntzen, L. E. & Sandberg, S. (2014). The collective nature of lone wolf terrorism: Anders Behring Breivik and the anti-Islamic social movement. Terrorism and political violence, 26(5), 759-779.
Braddock, K. (2015). The utility of narratives for promoting radicalization: The case of the Animal Liberation Front. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, 8(1), 38-59.
Braddock, K. & Horgan, J. (2016). Towards a guide for constructing and disseminating counternarratives to reduce support for terrorism. Conflict and Terrorism, 39(5), 381-404.
Braniff, W. (2019). ‘Countering Domestic Terrorism: Examining the Evolving Threat.’ Testimony before the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Testimony-Braniff-2019-09-25.pdf
Castelli, L., & Carraro, L. (2011). Ideology is related to basic cognitive processes involved in attitude formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(5), 1013-1016.
Choma, B. et al. (2018). Right-wing ideology as a predictor of collective action: a test across four political issue domains. Political Psychology, 41(2), 303-322. Jedinger, A. & Burger, A. M. (2018). The ideological foundations of economic protectionism: Authoritarianism, Social Dominance Orientation, and the moderating role of political involvement. Political Psychology, 41(2), 403-424.
Coosaet, R. (2015). What drives Europeans to Syria, and to IS? Insights from the Belgian case. Egmont Paper #75, p.18. Gent, Belgium: Academia Press.
https://www.egmontinstitute.be/app/uploads/2015/03/75.pdf?type=pdf
Corman, S. R. (2011). Understanding the role of narrative in extremist strategic communication. In L. Fenstermacher and S. Canna (Eds.), Countering violent extremism: Scientific methods & strategies (pp. 36-43). Dayton, OH: Air Force Research Laboratory. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA552480.pdf
Dornschneider, S. (2016). Whether to kill: The cognitive maps of violent and nonviolent individuals. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Ewick, P., & Silbey, S. S. (1995). Subversive stories and hegemonic tales: Toward a sociology of narrative. Law & Society Review, 29(2), 197–226. Patterson, M. & Monroe, K. R. (1998). Narrative in political science. Annual Review of Political Science, 1(1), 315-331. Dingfelder, S. F. (2011). Our stories, ourselves. Monitor on Psychology, 42(1), 42.
Gallup Historical Trends. https://news.gallup.com/poll/1576/abortion.aspx
Halverson, J. R., Corman, S. R., & Goodall, H. L. (2011). Master narratives of Islamist extremism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Holbrook, D. (2019). The terrorism information environment: Analysing terrorists’ selection of ideological and facilitative media, Terrorism and Political Violence, 33(4), 1-23.
Holbrook, D. & Horgan, J. (2019). Terrorism and ideology: Cracking the nut. Perspectives on Terrorism, 13(6), 2-15. See p. 6. https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/binaries/content/assets/customsites/perspectives-on-terrorism/2019/issue-6/01-holbrook-and-horgan.pdf
Huber, J. D. (1989). Values and partisanship in left-right orientations: measuring ideology. European Journal of Political Research, 17(5), 599-621. Curtis, K. A. & Nielson, J. H. (2018). Predispositions matter…But how? Ideology as mediator of personality’s effect on EU support in five countries. Political Psychology, 39(6), 1251-1270.
Koehler, D. (2016). Violent radicalization revisited: A practice-oriented model – analysis. Eurasia Review, 9 January. https://www.eurasiareview.com/09012016-violent-radicalization-revisited-a-practice-oriented-model-analysis/
Koehler, D. (2017). Understanding deradicalization: Methods, tools and programs for countering violent extremism. New York: Routledge.
Koehler, D. (2021). From traitor to zealot: Exploring the phenomenon of side-switching in extremism and terrorism. Cambridge University Press. Pp. 12-13.
Leuprecht, C., Hataley, T., Moskalenko, S., & McCauley, C. (2009). Winning the battle but losing the war? Narrative and counter-narratives strategy. Perspectives on Terrorism, III(2), 25-35. Leuprecht, C., Hataley, T., Moskalenko, S., & McCauley, C. (2010). Narratives and counter-narratives for global jihad: Opinion versus action. Pp. 58-71 in Eelco J.A.M. Kessels (Ed.), Countering violent extremist narratives. Breda, The Netherlands: National Coordinator for Counterterrorism (NCTb). Leuprecht, C., Hataley, T., Moskalenko, S., & McCauley, C. (2010). Containing the narrative: Strategy and tactics in countering the storyline of global Jihad. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 5(1), 40-55.
Marsden, S. (2017). Reintegrating extremists: Deradicalization and desistence. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
McCauley, C. & Moskalenko, S. (2017). Friction: How conflict radicalizes them and us. New York: Oxford University Press. See Chapter Seven.
McAdam, D. (1986). Recruitment to high-risk activism: The case of freedom summer.
American Journal of Sociology, 92, 64–90. See p.70
Miller, E. (2017). Ideological Motivations of Terrorism in the United States, 1970—2016. https://www.start.umd.edu/pubs/START_IdeologicalMotivationsOfTerrorismInUS_Nov2017.pdf
Mullins, W. A. (1972). On the concept of ideology in political science. American Political Science Review, 66(2), 498-510. Hamilton, M. B. (1987). The elements of the concept of ideology. Political Studies, 35(1), 18-38. Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual review of psychology, 60(1), 307-337. Feldman, S. (2013). Political Ideology. In L. Huddy, D. O. Sears, & J. S. Levy (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology, 2nd ed. (pp. 591-626). New York: Oxford University Press. Maynard, J. L., & Mildenberger, M. (2018). Convergence and divergence in the study of ideology: A critical review. British Journal of Political Science, 48(2), 563-589. Hammersley, M. (2020). Ideology. Chapter 2 in Troubling sociological concepts. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Munson, Z. (2008). The making of pro-life activists: How social movement mobilization works. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pew Research Center. (2011). Muslim Americans: No signs of growth in alienation or support for extremism. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2011/08/30/muslim-americans-no-signs-of-growth-in-alienation-or-support-for-extremism/
Reidy, K. (2019). Benevolent radicalization: An antidote to terrorism. Perspectives on Terrorism, 13(4), 1-13.
Schneider, S. & Rabinowitz, H. (2021). Capitol riot defendants raise more than $2 million from crowdfunding. CNN, 1 September. https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/01/politics/capitol-riot-crowdfunding/index.html
Shaffer, R. (2020). Militant and terrorist ideology, meaning, and radicalization. Terrorism and Political Violence, 32(5), 1106-1112.
Snow. D. & Byrd, S. C. (2007). Ideology, framing processes, and Islamic movements. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 12(2), 119–136.
Snow. D. & Byrd, S. C. (2007). Ideology, framing processes, and Islamic movements. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 12(2), 119–136. For 15 studies that have measured diagnostic and prognostic frames in the context of social movements, see Snow, D. A. (2004). Framing processes, ideology, and discursive fields. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 380-412). Hoboken: Wiley.
Snow, D. A. & Benford, R. D. (2000). Comment on Oliver and Johnston: Clarifying the relationship between framing and ideology. Mobilization: An International Journal 2000, 5(1), 55-60. P.59. https://users.ssc.wisc.edu/~oliver/PROTESTS/ArticleCopies/SnowBenford2000ReplytoOliverJohnstonMoby.pdf
Taras, V., Rowney, J., & Steel, P. (2009). Half a century of measuring culture: Review of approaches, challenges, and limitations based on the analysis of 121 instruments for quantifying culture. Journal of International Management, 15(4), 357-373.
Taylor, M. & Ramsey, G. (2018). Violent radical content and the relationship between ideology and behaviour: Do counter-narratives matter? Pp. 94-111 in Eelco J.A.M. Kessels (Ed.), Countering violent extremist narratives. Breda, The Netherlands: National Coordinator for Counterterrorism (NCTb). https://www.ris.uu.nl/ws/files/20779441/Countering_Violent_Extremist_Narratives_2_tcm126_444038_2_.pdf
Wiktorowicz, Q. (Editor) (2003). Islamic activism: A social movement theory approach. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. Beck, C. (2008). The contribution of Social Movement Theory to understanding terrorism. Sociology Compass, 2(5), 1565–1581. Page, M., Challita, L., & Harris, A. (2011). Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula: Framing narratives and prescriptions. Terrorism and Political Violence, 23(2), 150-172.
Wilson, J. (1973). Introduction to social movements. New York: Basic Books, pp. 104-131.
Zald, M. N. (2000). Ideologically structured action: An enlarged agenda for social movement research. Mobilization, 5(1), 1-16.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Clark McCauley
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The JD Journal for Deradicalization uses a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND) Licence. You are free to share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format under the following conditions:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, andindicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
