Evidence and Ideology in the Independent Review of Prevent
Keywords:
Counter-Terrorism, Counter-Radicalisation, Independent Review, Prevent Strategy, IdeologyAbstract
A key part of the United Kingdom’s counter-terrorism framework, the Prevent Strategy is designed to operate ‘upstream’ to stop people becoming or supporting terrorists. In February 2023 the long-awaited independent review of Prevent reported, evaluating the Strategy against its core objectives. Led by Sir William Shawcross, the report claimed that Prevent’s overarching rationale remains good because the UK continues to face a genuine terrorist threat, but lamented its diversion toward safeguarding and its downplaying of Islamist extremism as the purportedly most pressing source of radicalisation within the UK today. To declare the reception to Shawcross’ report mixed would be generous, with some observers even demanding that the Government withdraw the review. We share many concerns raised by civil society groups and practitioners, and in this piece argue that the Review is fundamentally flawed because of its partial – in the sense of both limited and biased – engagement with the relevant (and extensive) knowledge base that exists around radicalisation, counter radicalisation, and Prevent. More specifically – and with particular attention to the report’s emphasis on ‘ideology’ – we show: (i) that the report suffers from a selective, and problematic, engagement with relevant academic research that poorly represents established knowledge in this area; (ii) that this selective engagement leads to a questionable, and highly contestable, conceptual framing of the report’s core terms and parameters; and, (iii) that this contestable framing has implications for operationalisation of the report’s findings. In doing this, the article makes three core contributions in: (i) situating the Shawcross review in relevant historical and policy contexts; (ii) offering original analytical critique of the review’s methodological and political assumptions and findings; and, (iii) extending research on the mechanisms of counter-terrorism review via this new – and underexplored – case study.
References
Amnesty International (n.d.) Demolish Apartheid Not Palestinian Homes. Available at: https://www.amnesty.org/en/petition/demolish-apartheid-not-palestinian-homes-petition/. (Accessed 6 February 2024).
Amnesty International (2023) UK: Shawcross Review of Prevent is 'Deeply Prejudiced and has no Legitimacy'. Available at: https://www.amnesty.org.uk/press-releases/uk-shawcross-review-prevent-deeply-prejudiced-and-has-no-legitimacy. (Accessed: 25 July 2023).
Anderson, D. (2014) ‘The Independent Review of UK Terrorism Laws’, New Journal of European Criminal Law, 5(4), pp.432-446.
Baker-Beall, C., Heath-Kelly, and Jarvis, L. (eds.) (2015) Counter-Radicalisation: Critical Perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge.
Barendt, E. (2009) ‘Incitement to, and Glorification of, Terrorism’, in Hare, I. and Weinstein, J. (eds) Extreme Speech and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.445-462.
Bélanger, J. J., Adam-Troian, J., Nisa, C. F., and Schumpe, B. M. (2022) ‘Ideological Passion and Violent Activism: The Moderating Role of the Significance Quest, British Journal of Psychology, 113(4), pp. 917–937.
Bjorgo, T. (2009) ‘Processes of Disengagement from Violent Groups of the Extreme Right’, in Bjorgo, T. and Horgan, J. (eds.) Leaving Terrorism Behind: Individual and Collective Disengagement. London: Routledge, pp.30-48.
Bjorgo, T. and Horgan, J. (2009) ‘Introduction’, in Bjorgo, T. and Horgan, J. (eds.) Leaving Terrorism Behind: Individual and Collective Disengagement. London: Routledge, pp.1-14.
Blackbourn, J. (2014) ‘Evaluating the Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation’, Parliamentary Affairs, 67(4), pp.955-968.
Blackbourn, J., de Londras, F. and Morgan, L. (2019) Accountability and Review in the Counter-Terrorist State. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
Borum, R. (2011) ‘Radicalisation into Violent Extremism I: A Review of Social Science Theories’, Journal of Strategic Security, 4(4), pp.7-36.
Bowcott, O. (2019) ‘Lord Carlile Removed from Prevent Review After Legal Challenge’, The Guardian (20 December). Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/dec/19/lord-carlile-prevent-review-legal-challenge#:~:text=Lord%20Carlile%20QC%20has%20been,legal%20challenge%20over%20his%20appointment. (Accessed: 25 July 2023).
Brighton, S. (2007) ‘British Muslims, Multiculturalism and UK Foreign Policy: ‘Integration’ and ‘Cohesion’ in and Beyond the State’, International Affairs, 83(1), pp.1-17.
Busher, J., Malkki, L. and Marsden, S. (2023) The Routledge Handbook on Radicalisation and Countering Radicalisation. London: Routledge.
Cairney, P. (2016) The Politics of Evidence-Based Policy Making. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Carlile, A. (2011) Report to the Home Secretary of Independent Oversight of Prevent Review and Strategy. London: HM Government. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/97977/lord-carlile-report.pdf. (Accessed: 25 July 2023).
Carson, J. V., and Suppenbach, M. (2018) ‘The Global Jihadist Movement: The Most Lethal Ideology?’, Homicide Studies, 22(1), pp. 8-44.
Carson, J. V. and Turner, N. D. (2024) ‘The Role of Ideology in Terrorist Attack Intentions and Outcomes’, Terrorism and Political Violence, 36(1), pp. 90–112
Carter, B., Ahmed, R., Albayrak, C., and Van Nuys, M. (2023) ‘Disaggregating Religiously Motivated Terrorism: Ideology as a Frame for Strategic Behaviour in Islamist and Christian Fundamentalist Terrorism’, Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 18(1), pp. 72-94.
Cassam, Q. (2018) ‘The Epistemology of Terrorism and Radicalisation’, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 84, pp.187-209.
Chukwuma, K., & Jarvis, L. (2024) ‘Countering violence or ideas? The politics of counter-radicalisation’ in J. Busher, L. Malkki, and S. Marsden (eds.) The Routledge Handbook on Radicalisation and Countering Radicalisation. Abingdon: Routledge, pp.247-261.
Choudhury, T. and Fenwick, H. (2011) The Impact of Counter-Terrorism Measures on Muslim Communities. Manchester: Equality and Human Rights Commission.
Clarke, J., & Newman, J. (2017). ‘People in this country have had enough of experts’: Brexit and the paradoxes of populism. Critical Policy Studies, 11(1), pp.101-116.
Cleary S. D., Candilis P. J., Dhumad S., Dyer A. R., and Khalifa N. (2024) ‘Pathway to Terrorist Behaviors: The Role of Childhood Experiences, Personality Traits, and Ideological Motivations in a Sample of Iraqi Prisoners, Journal of Forensic Science, 69(2), pp. 563-573.
Clubb, G. and McDaid, S. (2019) ‘The Causal Role of Ideology and Cultural Systems in Radicalisation and De-Radicalisation’, Journal of Critical Realism, 18(5), pp.513-528.
Corner, E. and Gill, P. (2017) ‘Is There a Nexus Between Terrorist Involvement and Mental Health in the Age of the Islamic State?’, CTC Sentinel, 10(1), pp.1-10.
Corner, E. and Gill, P. (2015) ‘A False Dichotomy? Mental Illness and Lone-Actor Terrorism’, Law and Human Behaviour, 39(1), pp.23-34.
Corner, E., Bouhana, N. and Gill, P. (2019) ‘The Multifinality of Vulnerability Indicators in Lone-Actor Terrorism’, Crime & Law, 25(2), pp.111-132.
Cottee, S. (2015) ‘The Pre-Terrorists Among Us: Is it Possible to Stop Terrorism Before it Happens?’, The Atlantic (27 October). Available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/10/counterterrorism-prevention-britain-isis/412603/. (Accessed: 24 May 2023).
Cummings, B. (2001) ‘Some Thoughts Subsequent to September 11th’, Social Science Research Council, 1 November. Available at: https://items.ssrc.org/after-september-11/some-thoughts-subsequent-to-september-11th/. (Accessed: 25 July 2023).
Dodd, V. and Syal, R. (2023) ‘Former Counter-Terror Chief Hits out at ‘Insulting’ Findings or Prevent Review’, The Guardian (8 February). Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/feb/08/prevent-scheme-failing-to-tackle-non-violent-islamist-extremism-review-says. (Accessed: 25 July 2023).
della Porta, D. (1995) Social Movements, Political Violence, and the State: A Comparative Analysis of Italy and Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dresser, P. (2018) ‘Counter-radicalisation through safeguarding: A political analysis of the counter-terrorism and security act (2015)’ Journal for Deradicalization, 16(1), pp.125-164.
Dudenhoefer, A. (2018) ‘Resisting radicalisation: A critical analysis of the UK Prevent duty’, Journal for Deradicalization, 14(1), pp.154-191.
Gill, P., Clemmow, C., Hetzel, F., Rottweiler, B., Salman, N., Van Der Vegt, I., Marchment, Z., Schumann, S., Zolghadriha, S., Schulten, N., Taylor, H. and Corner, E. (2021) ‘Systematic Review of Mental Health Problems and Violent Extremism’, Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 32(1), pp.51-78.
Githens-Mazer, J. and Lambert, R. (2010) ‘Why Conventional Wisdom on Radicalisation Fails: The Persistence of a Failed Discourse’, International Affairs, 86(4), pp.889-901.
Grierson, J. (2021a) ‘Hundreds of Islamic Groups Boycott Prevent Review Over Choice of Chair’, The Guardian (17 March). Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/mar/17/hundreds-islamic-groups-boycott-prevent-review-william-shawcross-protest. (Accessed: 25 July 2023).
Grierson, J. (2021b) ‘Should the Plymouth Shootings be Declared an Act of Terror?’, The Guardian (13 August). Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/aug/13/should-the-plymouth-shootings-be-declared-an-act-of-terror. (Accessed: 25 July 2023).
Gruenewald, J., Chermak, S. and Freilich, J. D. (2013) ‘Distinguishing “Loner” Attacks from Other Domestic Extremist Violence: A Comparison of Far-Right Homicide Incident and Offender Characteristics’, Criminology & Public Policy, 12(1), pp.65-91.
Hafez, M. and Mullins, C. (2015) ‘The Radicalisation Puzzle: A Theoretical Synthesis of Empirical Approaches to Homegrown Extremism’, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 38(11), pp.958-975.
Hall, J. (2022) ‘The Role of the Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation’, Judicial Review, 27(1), pp.24-27.
Handyside v United Kingdom (1979-80) 1 EHRR 737.
Harry’s Place (n.d.) Home. Available at: http://hurryupharry.net. (Accessed: 25 July 2023).
HC Deb 10 July 2006, vol 448, col 1120.
Health and Social Care Information Centre (2015) Health Survey for England, 2014. Available at: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20180328135732/http:/digital.nhs.uk/catalogue/PUB19295. (Accessed: 24 May 2023)
Heath-Kelly, C. and Strausz, E. (2019) ‘The Banality of Counterterrorism "After, After 9/11"? Perspectives on the Prevent Duty from the UK Health Care Sector’, Critical Studies on Terrorism, 12(1), pp 89-109.
HM Government (2018) CONTEST: The United Kingdom’s Strategy for Countering Terrorism. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office (Cm 9608).
HM Government (2023a) CONTEST: The United Kingdom’s Strategy for Countering Terrorism 2023. London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office (CP 903).
HM Government (2023b) The Response to the Independent Review of Prevent. (HC 1073). London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office.
HM Government (n.d.) Independent Reviewer of Prevent: William Shawcross. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/people/william-shawcross. (Accessed: 25 January 2024).
Hoffman, B., Ware, J. and Shapiro, E. (2020) ‘Assessing the Threat of Incel Violence’, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 43(7), pp.565-587.
Hofmann, D. (2012) ‘Review Essay: Twenty Important Journal Articles on Radicalisation to, and De-Radicalisation from, Terrorism’, Perspectives on Terrorism, 6(6), pp.104-113.
Home Office (2023) Revised Prevent Duty Guidance: For England and Wales. London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/prevent-duty-guidance/revised-prevent-duty-guidance-for-england-and-wales. (Accessed: 25 July 2023).
Horgan, J. (1997) ‘Issues in Terrorism Research’, The Police Journal, 70(3), pp.193-202.
Horgan, J. (2008) ‘From Profiles to Pathway and Roots to Routes: Perspectives from Psychology on Radicalisation into Terrorism’, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 618(1), pp.80-94.
Jackson, R. (2007) ‘Constructing Enemies: ‘Islamic Terrorism’ in Political and Academic Discourse’, Government and Opposition, 42(3), pp.394-426.
Jarvis, L., Macdonald, S. and Whiting, J. (2024) Radicalisation, Counter-radicalisation and Prevent: A Vernacular Approach. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Jensen, M. A., Seate, A. A. and James, P. A. (2020) ‘Radicalisation to Violence: A Pathway Approach to Studying Extremism’, Terrorism and Political Violence, 32(5), pp.1067-1090.
Khan, R. M. (2023) ‘The coloniality of the religious terrorism thesis’, Review of International Studies, (first view), pp.1-20.
Kundnani, A. (2012) ‘Radicalisation: The Journey of a Concept’, Race & Class, 54(2), pp.3-25.
Kyriacou, C., Szczepek Reed, B., Said, F. and Davies, I. (2017) ‘British Muslim University Students’ Perceptions of Prevent and its Impact on Their Sense of Identity’, Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 12(2), pp.97-110.
Liberty (2023) Liberty Responds to Shawcross Review of Prevent. Available at: https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/liberty-responds-to-shawcross-review-of-prevent/. (Accessed: 25 July 2023).
Lynch, A. (2012) ‘The Impact of Post-Enactment Review of Anti-Terrorism Laws: Four Jurisdictions Compared’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 18(1), pp.63-81.
Lynch, A. and McGarrity, N. (2010) ‘A “Watch Dog” of Australia’s Counter-Terrorism Laws – The Coming of the National Security Legislation Monitor’, Flinders Law Journal, 12(1), pp.83-118.
Macdonald, S., Whiting, A., and Jarvis, L. (2021). What do students think of Prevent? Examining the experiences, understandings and evaluations of students in Higher Education in England and Wales. Available at: https://www.swansea.ac.uk/media/Prevent-report.pdf. (Accessed: 25 January 2024).
Malthaner, S. (2017) ‘Radicalization: The Evolution of an Analytical Paradigm’, European Journal of Sociology, 58(3), pp.369-401.
Marchment, Z., Bouhana, N. and Gill, P. (2020) ‘Lone Actor Terrorists: A Residence-to-Crime Approach’, Terrorism and Political Violence, 32(7), pp.1413-1438.
Marsden, S. and Copeland, S. (2020) The Relationship Between Mental Health Problems and Terrorism. Available at: https://crestresearch.ac.uk/resources/the-relationship-between-mental-health-problems-and-terrorism/. (Accessed: 23 May 2023).
Matza, M. (2023) ‘Terrorism Ruling First for Canada ‘Incel’ Attack’, BBC News (6 June). Available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-65829240. (Accessed: 25 July 2023).
Meleagrou-Hitchens, A. (2022) The UK Prevent Strategy: A Literature Review, 2011-2021. Available at: https://counterextremism.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/UK_Prevent_Strategy_11-21_WEB.pdf. (Accessed: 25 January 2024).
Moeller, M. J., Langer, P. C. and Scheithauer, H. (2022) ‘Motivational Dynamics of German Salafist Jihadists: A Multi-Methodical In Depth Study of Three Paradigmatic Cases’, Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1009222 (17pp). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1009222.
Mohamedou, M. M. O. (2018) A Theory of ISIS: Political Violence and the Transformation of the Global Order. London: Pluto Press.
Morris, S. (2023) ‘Plymouth Shooting: Burst of Savagery that Began with an Attack on a Mother’, The Guardian (20 February). Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/feb/20/plymouth-shooting-eight-minutes-of-savagery-inquest-jake-davison. (Accessed: 25 July 2023).
National Union of Students (n.d.) Scrap Prevent – Students Not Suspects. Available at: https://www.nusconnect.org.uk/campaigns/liber8-education/scrap-prevent-students-not-suspects. (Accessed: 25 January 2024).
Neal, A. W. (2012) ‘Terrorism, lawmaking, and democratic politics: Legislators as security actors’, Terrorism and Political Violence, 24(3), pp.357-374.
Neumann, P. (2013) ‘The Trouble with Radicalisation’, International Affairs, 89(4), pp.873-893.
Powell, L. (2016) ‘Counter-Productive Counter-Terrorism. How is the dysfunctional discourse of Prevent failing to restrain radicalisation?’, Journal for Deradicalization, 8(1), pp.46-99.
Prevent Review (n.d.) The People’s Revie of Prevent. Available at: https://peoplesreviewofprevent.org (Accessed 30 January 2024).
Radicalisation Research (n.d.) Resources. Available at: https://www.radicalisationresearch.org/research/. (Accessed: 25 July 2023).
Ranstorp, M. (2013) ‘“Lone Wolf Terrorism”: The Case of Anders Brevik’, Security and Peace, 31(2), pp.87-92.
Richards, A. (2015) ‘From Terrorism to 'Radicalization' to 'Extremism': Counterterrorism Imperative or Loss of Focus?’, International Affairs, 91(2), pp.371-380.
Rights Watch (UK) (2016) Preventing Education? Human Rights and UK Counter Terrorism Policy in Schools. London: Rights Watch (UK).
Rottweiler, B., Gill, P. and Bouhana, N. (2022) ‘Individual and Environmental Explanations for Violent Extremist Intentions: A German Nationally Representative Survey Study’, Justice Quarterly, 39(4), pp.825-846.
Sageman, M. (2004) Understanding Terror Networks. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Said, E. (2003) Orientalism. London: Penguin.
Schmid, A. P. (2013) Radicalisation, De Radicalisation, Counter-Radicalisation: A Conceptual Discussion and Literature Review. The Hague: International Centre for Counter-Terrorism.
Schuurman, B. (2020) ‘Research on Terrorism, 2007-2016: A Review of Data, Methods, and Authorship’, Terrorism and Political Violence, 32(5), pp.1011-1026.
Schuurman, B. (2023) ‘Debating the Health of Terrorism Studies: Methodological Issues, Research Biases and Cautious Optimism’, in Frumkin, L. A., Morrison, J. F. and Silke, A. (eds) A Research Agenda for Terrorism Studies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp.179-192.
Shawcross, W. (2023) Independent Review of Prevent. (HC 1072). London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office.
Silke, A. (2001) ‘The Devil You Know: Continuing Problems with Research on Terrorism’, Terrorism and Political Violence, 13(4), pp.1-14.
Silke, A. (2009) ‘Contemporary Terrorism Studies: Issues in Research’, in Jackson, R., Breen Smyth, M. and Gunning, J. (eds) Critical Terrorism Studies: A New Research Agenda. Abingdon: Routledge, pp.34-48.
Simcox, R. (2023) ‘Commissioner for Countering Extremism on the Independent Review of Prevent’, Commission for Countering Extremism, 9 February. Available at https://extremismcommission.blog.gov.uk/2023/02/. (Accessed: 25 July 2023).
Taylor, D. (2023a) ‘Home Office Threatened with Libel Action over Prevent Strategy Review’, The Guardian (30 January). Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/jan/30/home-office-threatened-with-libel-action-over-prevent-strategy-review. (Accessed: 25 July 2023).
Taylor, D. (2023b) ‘Withdraw Review of Prevent Anti-Radicalisation Strategy, Ministers Urged’, The Guardian (21 March). Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/mar/21/withdraw-review-of-prevent-anti-radicalisation-strategy-ministers-urged. (Accessed: 25 July 2023).
Terrorism Act 2000, c. 11. Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/11/contents. (Accessed: 25 January 2024).
Thomas, P. (2010) ‘Failed and Friendless: The UK’s ‘Preventing Violent Extremism’ Programme’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 12(3), pp.442-458.
Tinnes, J. (2015) ‘Bibliography: Homegrown Terrorism and Radicalisation’, Perspectives on Terrorism, 9(6), pp.119-153.
University and College Union (2015) The Prevent Duty: A Guide for Branches and Members. Available at: https://www.ucu.org.uk/media/7370/The-prevent-duty-guidance-for-branches-Dec-15/pdf/ucu_preventdutyguidance_dec15.pdf. (Accessed: 25 July 2023).
Walker, C. (2006) ‘Clamping Down on Terrorism in the United Kingdom’ Journal of International Criminal Justice, 4(5), pp.1137-1151.
Whiting, A., Campbell, B., Spiller, K. and Awan, I. (2020) ‘The Prevent Duty in UK Higher Education: Insights from Freedom of Information Requests’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 23(3), pp.513-532.
Wiktorowicz, Q. (2005) Radical Islam Rising: Muslim Extremism in the West. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Stuart Macdonald, Andrew Whiting, Lee Jarvis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The JD Journal for Deradicalization uses a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND) Licence. You are free to share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format under the following conditions:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, andindicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.