Interviewing activists and terrorists: a detailed research protocol
Keywords:
Understanding-Based Interviewing, Radicalization, Terrorism, Bourdieu, Social Media, Grounded TheoryAbstract
In the domain of PVE as well as reintegration, the most interesting studies are arguably based on material collected first-hand from the individuals involved in the phenomenon of political violence or terrorism. As more individuals from the 2013-2016 wave of foreign terrorist fighters are exiting the criminal justice system, young individuals with no memory of that period are sympathizing with ISIS and others again are joining right-wing groups with violent agendas. Understanding the motives behind such engagement will always lead a portion of the scholars to pursue interview-based studies. This paper describes the research protocol used for a study which dealt with politico-ideological mobilization and violence in relation to causes and conflicts in the Arab World. More than one hundred interviews were conducted in Lebanon, Switzerland and Canada with individuals involved in politico-ideological mobilization or violence of different ideological orientations. Besides interviews, complementary material in the form of ethnographic fieldnotes and voice recordings via instant messaging were collected. The data was compiled into a MAXQDA database and coded according to the principles of Grounded Theory, using open, selective, axial and theoretical coding. The paper further discusses epistemological and ethical considerations.
References
Ajil, A. (2023a). Politico-ideological mobilization and violence in the Arab World: All in. London: Routledge.
Ajil, A. (2023b). Studying Terror Through my I's: Autoethnographic Insider/Outsider Reflections of an Arab-Muslim Researcher, Perspectives on Terrorism, Vol. XVII, Issue 2, 74-91.
Ajil, A. & Blount-Hill, K.-L. (2020). “Writing the Other as Other”: Exploring the Othered Lens in Academia Using Collaborative Autoethnography. Decolonization of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 2(1), 83-108.
Akram, S. (2014). Recognizing the 2011 United Kingdom riots as political protest: A theoretical framework based on agency, habitus and the preconscious. British Journal of Criminology, 54(3), 375-392.
Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2015). Grounded theory: A practical guide. London: Sage
Birks, M., Hoare, K., & Mills, J. (2019). Grounded theory: the FAQs. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1-7.
Blount-Hill, K.-L. (2020). Exploring a Social Identity Theory of Shared Narrative: Insights from Resident Stories of Police Contact in Newark, New Jersey, and Cleveland, Ohio. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 48(6), 810-827.
Bonelli, L., & Carrié, F. (2018). La fabrique de la radicalité - Une sociologie des jeunes djihadistes français. Paris: Le Seuil.
Bourdieu, P. (1996). Understanding. Theory, Culture & Society, 13(2), 17-37.
Chang, H. (2016). Autoethnography in Health Research: Growing Pains? Qualitative Health Research, 26(4), 443-451.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory. London: Sage
Crettiez, X. & Ainine, B. (2017). Soldats de Dieu, paroles de djihadistes incarcérés. Éditions de l’Aube, Fondation Jean-Jaurès.
Dearnley, C. (2005). A reflection on the use of semi-structured interviews. Nurse researcher, 13(1), 19-28.
Deslauriers, J. P. (1987). L’analyse en recherche qualitative. Cahiers de recherche sociologique, 5(2), 145-152.
Dornschneider, S. (2021). Analyzing ethnographic interviews: Three studies on terrorism and nonviolent resistance. International Political Science Review, 42(2), 1-15.
Ely, M., Anzul, M., Friedman, T., Garner, D., & Steinmetz, A. M. (1991). Doing Qualitative Research: Circles Within Circles. London: The Falmer Press.
Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Haugstvedt, H. (2020). Research Note: ‘How Can I Get Them Offstage?’– Critical Reflections on a Researcher’s Approach to Qualitative Data Collection with Social Workers Involved in Preventing Violent Extremism in Norway, Journal for Deradicalization, 23, 214-234.
Horgan, J. (2012). Interviewing the terrorists: Reflections on fieldwork and implications for psychological research. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 4(3), 195-211.
Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi‐structured interview guide. Journal of advanced nursing, 72(12), 2954-2965
Khosrokhavar, F. (2006). Quand Al-Qaïda parle. Témoignages derrière les barreaux. Paris: Grasset.
Koehler, D., Clubb, G., Bélanger, J. J., Becker, M. H., & Williams, M. J. (2023). Don’t kill the messenger: Perceived credibility of far-right former extremists and police officers in P/CVE communication. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 1-20.
Luna-Reyes, L.F. & Andersen, D.F. (2003). Collecting and analyzing qualitative data for system dynamics: methods and models. System Dynamics Review, 19(4), 271-296.
McAdams, D. P., & McLean, K. C. (2013). Narrative identity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(3), 233-238.
McLean, K. C., Lilgendahl, J. P., Fordham, C., Alpert, E., Marsden, E., Szymanowski, K., & McAdams, D. P. (2018). Identity development in cultural context: The role of deviating from master narratives. Journal of Personality, 86(4), 631-651.
Nilsson, M. (2018). Interviewing Jihadists: on the importance of drinking tea and other methodological considerations. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 41(6), 419-432.
Presser, L. (2016). Criminology and the narrative turn. Crime, Media, Culture, 12(2), 137-151.
Raatikainen, Panu (2017). Explanation and Understanding Revisited. In Niiniluoto Ilkka & Wallgren Thomas (eds.), On the Human Condition: Philosophical Essays in Honour of the Centennial Anniversary of Georg Henrik von Wright. Acta Philosophica Fennica, vol 93 (pp. 339-353). Helsinki: The Philosophical Society of Finland.
Rustemi, A. (2022). Ensuring security while conducting research and fieldwork on countering and preventing religious and far-right violent extremism: The case of Southeastern Europe. Journal for Deradicalization, 31, 95-118.
Schuurman, B. (2020). Research on terrorism, 2007–2016: A review of data, methods, and authorship. Terrorism and Political Violence, 32(5), 1011-1026.
Shover, N. (2012). Ethnographic methods in criminological research: Rationale, reprise, and warning. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(2), 139-145.
Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Thompson, S. K., & Leroux, E. (2023). Lessons learned from dual site formative evaluations of Countering violent extremism (CVE) programming co-led by Canadian police. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 18(1), 24-42.
Thornberg, R. & Charmaz, K. (2014). Grounded theory and theoretical coding. In U. Flick (ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 153-169). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Walker, D., & Myrick, F. (2006). Grounded theory: An exploration of process and procedure. Qualitative health research, 16(4), 547-559.
Whiting, L. S. (2008). Semi-structured interviews: guidance for novice researchers. Nursing Standard (through 2013), 22(23), 35-40.
Woon, C. Y. (2013). For ‘emotional fieldwork’ in critical geopolitical research on violence and terrorism. Political Geography, 33, 31-41.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ahmed Ajil
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The JD Journal for Deradicalization uses a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND) Licence. You are free to share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format under the following conditions:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, andindicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
