Where Are They Now?: The Costs and Benefits of Doxxing Far-Right Extremists

Amarnath Amarasingam; Brad Galloway

Authors

Amarnath Amarasingam Queen’s University
Brad Galloway Organization for the Prevention of Violence

Keywords:

Doxxing, Far-Right Extremism, Antifascism, Former Extremists, Deradicalization, Disengagement

Abstract

Research on far-right extremism has grown substantially over the last decade, owing to the rise of Trump, attacks such as the one in Christchurch and Buffalo, as well as the mainstreaming of hate speech and polarization. In addition to research, there have been antifascist activists who have been engaged in doxxing members of the far right who are part of our schools, our militaries, and governments. Releasing the private information of members of far-right movements to the public has created interesting policy and law enforcement dilemmas. With respect to law enforcement, can doxxing be used as a tool to force individuals to disengage from groups? For social media companies, doxxing violates their terms of service, but should an exception be made in these instances since it purportedly serves a public interest? For this paper, we interviewed 10 former members of the far right who have experienced doxxing over the last several years. The paper explores what happened, the immediate and long-term effects of doxxing on their lives, and ongoing challenges of being exposed against their will. We conclude with some policy recommendations related to the costs and benefits of doxxing on these individuals but also society at large.

References

Amarasingam, A., Argentino, M.-A., & Macklin, G. (2022, July). The Buffalo attack: The cumulative momentum of far-right terror. CTC Sentinel, 15(7). https://ctc.westpoint.edu/the-buffalo-attack-the-cumulative-momentum-of-far-right-terror/

Amarasingam, A., St-Amant, M., & Jones, D. A. (2024, June). ‘Run silent, run deep’: Examining right-wing extremism in the military. Perspectives on Terrorism, 18(2).

Anderson, B., & Wood, M. (2021). Doxxing: A scoping review and typology. In J. Bailey, A. Flynn, & N. Henry (Eds.), The Emerald international handbook of technology facilitated violence and abuse (pp. 205-226). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://www.emerald.com/insight/publication/doi/10.1108/9781839828485

Chen, Q., Chan, K. L., & Cheung, A. S. Y. (2018). Doxxing victimization and emotional problems among secondary school students in Hong Kong. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(12). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30486402/

Cheung, A. (2021). Doxxing and the challenge to legal regulation: When personal data become a weapon. In J. Bailey, A. Flynn, & N. Henry (Eds.), The Emerald international handbook of technology facilitated violence and abuse (pp. 577-594). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/978-1-83982-848-520211041/full/html

Clubb, G., Altier, M.-B., Kobayashi, Y., Davies, G., & Brownsord, E. (2024). Combating the Terrorist Stigma: Communicating Rehabilitation and Reducing Barriers to Reintegration. Terrorism and Political Violence, 1-18. doi:10.1080/09546553.2024.2317801

Colton, J. S., Holmes, S., & Walwema, J. (2017). From NoobGuides to #OpKKK: Ethics of Anonymous’ tactical technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 26(1), 59-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2016.1257743

Douglas, D. M. (2016). Doxxing: A conceptual analysis. Ethics and Information Technology, 18, 199-210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-016-9406-0

Franz, A., & Thatcher, J. B. (2023). Doxxing and doxxees: A qualitative analysis of victim experiences and response. ECIS 2023 Research Papers. https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1396&context=ecis2023_rp

Gómez, Á., Morales, J. F., Hart, S., Vázquez, A., & Swann, W. B. (2011). Rejected and Excluded Forevermore, but Even More Devoted:Irrevocable Ostracism Intensifies Loyalty to the Group Among Identity-Fused Persons. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(12), 1574-1586. doi:10.1177/0146167211424580

Kimball, M. A. (2017). Tactical technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 26(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2017.1259428

Matthews, R. S., Aghili, S., & Lindskog, D. (2014). A study of doxxing, its security implications and mitigation strategies for organizations. Concordia University of Edmonton. https://concordia.ab.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Roney_Mathews.pdf?x60138

Meredith, K. and Horgan, J. (2024). After they leave: exploring post-exit distress in former violent extremists. Journal for Deradicalization. No. 38. https://journals.sfu.ca/jd/index.php/jd/article/view/865

Moreham, N. A. (2014). Beyond information: Physical privacy in English law. Cambridge Law Journal, 73(2), 350-377. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-law-journal/article/abs/beyond-information-physical-privacy-in-english-law/793E5B27E6B326634C74542A80A042C5

Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., and Ranfagni, S., 2023. A step-by-step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, pp.1–18. DOI: 10.1177/16094069231205789.

Pfundmair, M. (2018). Ostracism promotes a terroristic mindset. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 11(2), 134-148. doi:10.1080/19434472.2018.1443965

Veilleux-Lepage, Y., Daymon, C., & Amarasingam, A. (2020, December). The Christchurch attack report: Key takeaways on Tarrant’s radicalization and attack planning. ICCT Perspective. https://www.icct.nl/publication/christchurch-attack-report-key-takeaways-tarrants-radicalization-and-attack-planning

Where Are They Now?: The Costs and Benefits of Doxxing Far-Right Extremists

Authors

Keywords:

Abstract

References

Downloads

Published

Issue

Section

License

Information